Lush Food & Drink

Buying Guide ·Storage

Best Reusable Lunch Containers for Small Lunch Bags

The deciding specification is the published width and depth, because a small lunch bag leaves little counter space.

By the Lush Editorial Team·Researched & Compared

  • Researched & ComparedSpecs pulled from the manufacturer listing
  • Like-for-LikeSame measures across every model
  • No Paid PlacementsNobody pays to appear here

I compared the five best-documented containers on the fact sheet, using only manufacturer-published dimensions, weights, capacities and features.

Our shortlist

Five products, one set of published numbers.
  1. Tanjiae 4Pack 8oz Small (1 CUP) Stainless Steel Snac...
    Best published footprint

    Tanjiae 4Pack 8oz Small (1 CUP) Stainless Steel Snac...

    Publishes 2.91 by 3.82 inches, the smallest width and depth among the five.

    • Tanjiae
    • 8 oz
    • 0.6 lb
  2. EASYFUN Bento Box Adult
    Most compartments

    EASYFUN Bento Box Adult

    Four compartments and a published 1000 ml capacity, with a 6.0 by 8.0 inch footprint.

    • EASYFUN
    • Large
    • 0.35 lb
  3. Bentgo Prep Meal Prep Containers with Lids
    Best for portion control

    Bentgo Prep Meal Prep Containers with Lids

    Each tray holds 4 cups and carries embossed measurements for portioning.

    • Bentgo
    • 10 Count (Pack of 1)
    • 1.3 lb
  4. buluker 4 Pack Bento Lunch Box Set 3 Compartment Foo...
    Best three-compartment set

    buluker 4 Pack Bento Lunch Box Set 3 Compartment Foo...

    Three compartments per box and a published 900 ml size, in a four-pack.

    • buluker
    • 900ml
    • 0.9 lb
  5. GoodCook Meal Prep Containers
    Lightest of the five

    GoodCook Meal Prep Containers

    Publishes 0.2 pound, the lightest weight among the five picks.

    • GoodCook
    • 1 Count (Pack of 1)
    • 0.2 lb

Side by side

Blank means the maker does not publish it.
ModelBrandSize (capacity)WeightBest for
Tanjiae 4Pack 8oz Small (1 CUP) Stainless Steel Snac... Tanjiae 8 oz 0.6 lb Best published footprint
EASYFUN Bento Box Adult EASYFUN Large 0.35 lb Most compartments
Bentgo Prep Meal Prep Containers with Lids Bentgo 10 Count (Pack of 1) 1.3 lb Best for portion control
buluker 4 Pack Bento Lunch Box Set 3 Compartment Foo... buluker 900ml 0.9 lb Best three-compartment set
GoodCook Meal Prep Containers GoodCook 1 Count (Pack of 1) 0.2 lb Lightest of the five

Each pick in detail

What the listing says for it, and against it.
1 Best published footprint

Tanjiae 4Pack 8oz Small (1 CUP) Stainless Steel Snac...

Publishes 2.91 by 3.82 inches, the smallest width and depth among the five.

  • For it
  • Publishes a 2.91 inch width and 3.82 inch depth, the smallest among the five
  • Stacks inside itself with the lids off
  • Silicone lids are described as leak proof
  • Dishwasher, freezer and oven safe
  • Against it
  • 8 oz capacity is the smallest published size among the five
  • The maker does not publish a height for the set as a whole
2 Most compartments

EASYFUN Bento Box Adult

Four compartments and a published 1000 ml capacity, with a 6.0 by 8.0 inch footprint.

  • For it
  • Four compartments in one box
  • Publishes a 1000 ml capacity
  • Lid has an embedded silicone gasket and four locking buckles
  • Removable tray is microwave and dishwasher safe
  • Against it
  • Publishes a 6.0 inch width and 8.0 inch depth, the largest footprint among the five
  • Weighs 0.35 pound, heavier than the GoodCook set
3 Best for portion control

Bentgo Prep Meal Prep Containers with Lids

Each tray holds 4 cups and carries embossed measurements for portioning.

  • For it
  • Each tray holds 4 cups with embossed measurements
  • Twenty pieces in the set, ten trays and ten lids
  • Lids are described as stackable
  • Microwave, freezer and dishwasher safe
  • Against it
  • Weighs 1.3 pounds, the heaviest among the five
  • The maker does not publish width, depth or height
4 Best three-compartment set

buluker 4 Pack Bento Lunch Box Set 3 Compartment Foo...

Three compartments per box and a published 900 ml size, in a four-pack.

  • For it
  • Three compartments per box
  • Four boxes in the set
  • Published 900 ml size
  • Safe temperature range of -4 F to 248 F
  • Against it
  • The maker does not publish width, depth or height
  • Lids must be removed before heating
5 Lightest of the five

GoodCook Meal Prep Containers

Publishes 0.2 pound, the lightest weight among the five picks.

  • For it
  • Weighs 0.2 pound, the lightest among the five
  • Ten containers and ten lids in the set
  • Single compartment embossed with 4 cup measurements
  • Domed lids do not compress food
  • Against it
  • The maker does not publish width, depth or height
  • Single compartment limits separation of foods

Our verdict

For a small lunch bag, published width and depth matter more than capacity. The Tanjiae 4Pack is the only pick with a published width of 2.91 inches and a depth of 3.82 inches, so it takes the least counter footprint among the five. The EASYFUN Bento Box publishes 6.0 inches by 8.0 inches, the largest footprint here. The GoodCook Meal Prep Containers publish no dimensions but weigh 0.2 pound, the lightest of the five. The Bentgo Prep weighs 1.3 pounds, the heaviest.

“Published width and depth decide the fit, not capacity.”

Lush Editorial Team

What separates these five

Start with width and depth Only three of the five publish a width or depth. Tanjiae publishes 2.91 by 3.82 inches, EASYFUN publishes 6.0 by 8.0 inches, and the other three publish neither.
Compartments change packing EASYFUN offers four compartments, buluker offers three, and the others offer one. More compartments can mean a larger published footprint.
Materials differ Tanjiae uses 18/8 stainless steel and silicone. buluker uses polypropylene and wheat fiber. The others state plastic construction without naming a grade.
Reheating rules vary Tanjiae is described as oven safe. EASYFUN, buluker, Bentgo and GoodCook are described as microwave safe, and buluker and Bentgo ask that lids be removed first.
Reuse claims All five are described as reusable. Dealusy is not among the picks because its published weight of 3.92 pounds is the heaviest on the sheet and its 50-pack suits bulk storage rather than a single lunch bag.

How we chose

Priorities, not a computed score. The inputs are published specifications, so we rank by what matters most and say how much.

  1. 30% Published width and depthA small lunch bag is a fit problem first, and only three of the five publish these figures.
  2. 25% Compartment countIt decides how a lunch can be packed and whether foods stay separate.
  3. 20% Stated materialStainless steel, wheat straw and plastic behave differently in cleaning and reheating.
  4. 15% Reheating guidanceMicrowave and oven claims affect how a packed lunch is warmed.
  5. 10% Published documentationA maker who states more figures gives a reader more to act on.

How the Five Compare on the Numbers

Only three of the five picks publish a width or a depth. Tanjiae states 2.91 inches by 3.82 inches, the smallest of those figures among the five. EASYFUN states 6.0 inches by 8.0 inches, the largest. Bentgo, buluker and GoodCook publish neither figure, so their fit in a small lunch bag cannot be judged from the fact sheet. Weight is published for all five, from 0.2 pound to 1.3 pounds.

Capacity is published in different units. EASYFUN states 1000 ml, buluker states 900 ml, Tanjiae states 8 oz, and Bentgo and GoodCook state 4 cups per container. Those figures describe volume, not footprint, and a large capacity can sit in a small bag if the published width and depth allow it. The table below sets the stated figures side by side.

Specification Tanjiae 4Pack EASYFUN Bento Box Bentgo Prep buluker Bento GoodCook Meal Prep
Published width 2.91 in 6.0 in not published not published not published
Published depth 3.82 in 8.0 in not published not published not published
Published height 1.89 in 2.0 in not published not published not published
Published weight 0.6 lb 0.35 lb 1.3 lb 0.9 lb 0.2 lb
Published capacity 8 oz 1000 ml 4 cups per tray 900 ml 4 cups per container
Compartments 1 4 1 3 1
Stated material 18/8 stainless steel, silicone Food-grade material, BPA-free PFAS- and BPA-free plastic Polypropylene, wheat fiber Plastic, BPA-free
Microwave safe not stated Yes, removable tray Yes, trays only Yes, lids off Yes
Oven safe Yes not stated not stated not stated not stated
Dishwasher safe Yes Yes Top rack, hand wash lids not stated Yes
Pieces in set 4 containers with lids 1 box with tray 10 trays, 10 lids 4 boxes with lids 10 containers, 10 lids

The table does not tell you how a container feels in the hand, how a lid seals after repeated washing, or whether a published width includes the lid. It also cannot tell you which figure is the depth and which is the height, because the listings publish a length, a width and a height without saying which is which. Treat every figure as a stated measurement, not a measured one.

What the Published Footprints Mean for a Small Bag

The two picks with stated width and depth

Tanjiae publishes 2.91 inches by 3.82 inches, and EASYFUN publishes 6.0 inches by 8.0 inches. Those are the only two picks with a stated width and depth, and the difference between them is 3.09 inches in width and 4.18 inches in depth. For a small lunch bag, that gap is the whole decision. A bag that accepts the EASYFUN footprint will accept the Tanjiae one with room to spare.

The Tanjiae set also stacks inside itself with the lids off, which the maker states saves space in a fridge or cabinet. EASYFUN does not make that claim. Neither maker states whether the published figures include the lid, so a reader should treat the numbers as the outside of the closed container and check the bag opening before buying.

What the other three leave unstated

Bentgo, buluker and GoodCook publish no width, depth or height. That does not mean they are large or small. It means the fact sheet cannot answer the fit question for them. A reader who needs a container to slide into a narrow bag has to rely on the maker’s own listing or measure the product after delivery, because no figure is available here.

What those three do publish is weight and capacity. GoodCook states 0.2 pound and 4 cups per container. Bentgo states 1.3 pounds and 4 cups per tray. buluker states 0.9 pound and 900 ml. Weight and capacity are unambiguous, so they can be compared directly even when dimensions cannot.

Compartments, Materials and Reheating

How many foods stay separate

EASYFUN publishes four compartments in a 1000 ml box. buluker publishes three compartments in a 900 ml box. Tanjiae, Bentgo and GoodCook each publish a single compartment. For a lunch that mixes a main, a side and a sauce, the compartment count decides how many small containers a reader has to pack alongside the main one.

More compartments do not automatically mean a better fit. EASYFUN publishes the largest width and depth among the five, 6.0 inches by 8.0 inches. buluker publishes no dimensions, so its three compartments cannot be compared on footprint. A reader who wants separation and a small footprint has to weigh the EASYFUN figures against the unstated buluker ones.

Materials and heat

Tanjiae states 18/8 stainless steel and silicone, and describes the set as oven safe, freezer safe and dishwasher safe. buluker states polypropylene and wheat fiber with a safe temperature range of -4 F to 248 F. Bentgo states PFAS- and BPA-free plastic. GoodCook states plastic without BPA. EASYFUN states a food-grade material that is BPA-free.

Reheating guidance differs. Bentgo states that only the trays should be microwaved and that lids should be hand washed. buluker asks that lids be removed before heating. EASYFUN states the removable tray is microwave safe. GoodCook states the containers are microwave safe. Tanjiae is the only pick described as oven safe, and its maker does not state a microwave claim.

Which One Fits Your Kitchen

Buyer with a narrow lunch bag. The Tanjiae 4Pack publishes the smallest width and depth among the five, 2.91 inches by 3.82 inches. Its 8 oz capacity suits snacks, sauces and small portions rather than a full meal.

Buyer who packs several foods at once. The EASYFUN Bento Box publishes four compartments and a 1000 ml capacity. Its published footprint is 6.0 inches by 8.0 inches, so check the bag opening before buying.

Buyer who portions by measurement. The Bentgo Prep states 4 cups per tray with embossed measurements. It publishes no dimensions, so the fit has to be checked against the maker’s own listing.

Buyer who wants three compartments in a set of four. The buluker Bento publishes three compartments and a 900 ml size across four boxes. No width, depth or height is published.

Buyer who wants the lightest set. The GoodCook Meal Prep publishes 0.2 pound, the lightest among the five, with ten containers and ten lids. No dimensions are published.

What We Could Not Verify

Several figures a reader would want are not stated anywhere on the fact sheet.

  • Width, depth and height for the Bentgo Prep, buluker Bento and GoodCook Meal Prep.
  • An overall height for the Tanjiae four-container set as packed.
  • Interior dimensions for any compartment on any of the five picks.
  • Whether published dimensions include the lid or the locking buckles.
  • A stated weight per single container rather than per set or pack.
  • Any published figure for lid thickness, gasket size or seal pressure.

Frequently asked questions

Which container has the smallest published footprint?+

The Tanjiae 4Pack publishes a width of 2.91 inches and a depth of 3.82 inches, the smallest of those figures among the five picks. The EASYFUN Bento Box publishes a width of 6.0 inches and a depth of 8.0 inches, the largest. Bentgo, buluker and GoodCook do not publish width or depth at all.

Does a smaller container always fit a small lunch bag better?+

Not necessarily. A published width and depth describe the outside of the container, and the listing does not say which figure is the depth and which is the height. A reader still has to check the bag opening against the published figures. Three of the five picks publish no dimensions, so their fit cannot be judged from the fact sheet.

Which pick holds the most food?+

The EASYFUN Bento Box publishes a 1000 ml capacity, the largest published capacity among the five picks. buluker publishes 900 ml. Bentgo states 4 cups per tray, which is about 946 ml. Tanjiae publishes 8 oz, or about 230 ml. GoodCook states 4 cups per container without a metric figure.

Which is the lightest pick?+

The GoodCook Meal Prep Containers publish a weight of 0.2 pound, the lightest among the five picks. The Bentgo Prep publishes 1.3 pounds, the heaviest. Tanjiae publishes 0.6 pound, EASYFUN publishes 0.35 pound, and buluker publishes 0.9 pound. Weight is stated per set or per pack, not per single container.

Can these containers be reheated?+

Tanjiae is described as oven safe and dishwasher safe. EASYFUN, buluker, Bentgo and GoodCook are described as microwave safe. buluker asks that lids be removed before heating, and Bentgo states that only the trays should be microwaved and lids should be hand washed. Always follow the maker's stated guidance.

Why is the Dealusy set not among the picks?+

The Dealusy set publishes a weight of 3.92 pounds, the heaviest on the fact sheet, and it ships as a 50-pack of 24 oz containers. That suits bulk meal preparation rather than a single small lunch bag. It also publishes no width, depth or height, so its fit cannot be compared with the five picks.

Specifications come from the manufacturers' own published listings. Lush Food & Drink may earn a commission if you buy through a link on this page, at no extra cost to you. How we research.