
GUCUJI Pack of 5 Premium Non stick Round Silicone De...
Mesh holes around 1x1 mm, the only figure behind a speed claim here.
- 12.6 inch for NESCO FD-61 FD-75... 5Pcs
- 0.32 lb
The deciding specification is what each maker publishes behind its own claim of faster drying, because only one of these five gives a mesh hole figure and the rest say fast in words alone.
By the Lush Editorial Team·Researched & Compared
Compared the twenty-four dehydrator tray and liner listings on the fact sheet by what each maker states will save time, and whether any figure supports it.

Mesh holes around 1x1 mm, the only figure behind a speed claim here.

Ten solid mats with a raised lip and ten mesh screens in one purchase.

Twelve sheets, stated to exist so no load pauses for washing.

Four 304 stainless trays rather than four liners for the racks you own.

Eight mesh sheets stated to need no scrubbing and no soaking.
| Model | Brand | Size (Capacity) | Weight | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUCUJI Pack of 5 Premium Non stick Round Silicone De... | GUCUJI | 12.6 inch for NESCO FD-61 FD-75... 5Pcs | 0.32 lb | Best for a published mesh hole size |
| 10 Pcs Silicone Dehydrator Mats & 10 Pcs Mesh Screen... | CiCixixi | 11.81*9.84In | 7.5 lb | Best for puree nights and berry nights |
| Silicone Dehydrator Sheets 14x14 Inch (12 Pack) - Re... | Lova | 14x14 Inch (Pack of 12) | 1.23 lb | Best for lining every rack at once |
| Baderke 4 Pcs Stainless Steel Dehydrator Trays Compa... | Baderke | not published | 1.51 lb | Best for more drying area |
| 8 Pack Silicone Dehydrator Sheets | XZZWLL | Large | 0.4 lb | Best for a rinse and nothing more |

Mesh holes around 1x1 mm, the only figure behind a speed claim here.

Ten solid mats with a raised lip and ten mesh screens in one purchase.

Twelve sheets, stated to exist so no load pauses for washing.

Four 304 stainless trays rather than four liners for the racks you own.

Eight mesh sheets stated to need no scrubbing and no soaking.
Four of these five say they save you time and mean four different things by it. GUCUJI publishes mesh holes around 1x1 mm and is the only maker with a figure behind the claim. CiCixixi publishes micro-hole screens with no size. Lova publishes twelve sheets so no load stops for washing. Baderke publishes four steel trays to dry two foods at once. XZZWLL publishes a rinse with no scrubbing.
“Everyone says faster. One of them publishes a figure.”
Lush Food & Drink
No listing here publishes the evidence. GUCUJI states that its mesh holes of around 1x1 mm promote fast, even drying with airflow above and below, and CiCixixi states that micro-hole screens boost airflow and shorten drying time. Neither publishes a drying time with the liner or without it, and no other listing in the pool of twenty-four does either. The claim is plausible and unmeasured.
It depends on the racks in your machine, and Lova is the only pick that reasons about it. It publishes twelve sheets so that every rack is lined in one go rather than three liners being reused across six shelves, and says the point is not pausing to wash mid load. XZZWLL publishes eight, GUCUJI five and Baderke four steel trays.
CiCixixi supplies ten mats with a raised lip for exactly that, alongside ten mesh screens. Lova states the opposite about itself: its mesh is for solid foods and purees, yogurt and fruit leather need a solid-surface liner instead. GUCUJI states liquids drain easily through its holes. Baderke is solid 304 steel, and XZZWLL is mesh with a center hole.
Not quite, and that is the reason to consider them. They are four 304 stainless trays at a stated 12 by 13 inches, so they are racks rather than liners for a rack. Four more racks means one larger load instead of two smaller ones. The listing states they are compatible with the CP267-FD model only, which is the narrowest fit here.
Because the fields measured the box. The fact sheet empties the unit dimensions on a multipack and keeps the carton figure separately, so GUCUJI and XZZWLL both show nothing in their length, width and height. CiCixixi keeps its fields because the maker's own words give the same numbers. Every other size here comes from a sentence rather than a field: 12.6 inches across, 14 by 14 inches, 13 inches across.
Three of the five publish something and only one publishes a number. GUCUJI states over 5,000 uses. Lova states reusable across hundreds of loads and XZZWLL states hundreds of uses, neither of which is a figure you can hold anyone to. CiCixixi states reusable with no quantity. Baderke publishes no reuse claim, though steel does not wear like silicone.
Specifications come from the manufacturers' own published listings. Lush Food & Drink may earn a commission if you buy through a link on this page, at no extra cost to you. How we research.
Four of these five listings say they save you time, and they mean four different things by it. Two say the mesh dries faster. One says twelve liners let you fill every rack at once. One says four trays let you dry two foods side by side. One says the washing up is quicker.
Only one of the five puts a figure behind the claim. GUCUJI publishes mesh holes of around 1×1 mm and states that they promote fast, even drying with airflow above and below. CiCixixi publishes micro-hole screens with no hole figure. Lova, Baderke and XZZWLL publish the claim and no measurement of any kind.
| Published specification | GUCUJI round mesh | CiCixixi mats and screens | Lova mesh sheets | Baderke steel trays | XZZWLL round mesh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What the maker says saves time | Mesh holes promote fast, even drying | Micro-hole screens boost airflow and shorten drying time | Line every rack without pausing to wash mid load | Dry different foods at once without mixing flavors | Quick cleanup, no scrubbing or soaking |
| Figure behind that claim | Mesh holes around 1×1 mm | not published | Twelve liners | Four trays | not published |
| Liners in one purchase | Five | Ten mats and ten screens, plus a spatula | Twelve | Four | Eight |
| Size the maker states | 12.6 in across | 11.81 by 9.84 in | 14 by 14 in | 12 by 13 in | 13 in across |
| Thickness published | 0.8 mm, given as 30 mil | not published | not published, the field reads 0.25 in | not published, the field reads 0.2 in | not published |
| Center hole published | not published | not applicable, a square mat | not applicable, a square sheet | not applicable, a steel tray | 1.6 in, given also as 4 cm |
| Drying surface | Mesh | Both, solid mats and mesh screens | Mesh, and states it is not for puree | Solid 304 steel | Mesh |
| Reuse claim published | Over 5,000 uses | reusable, no figure | Hundreds of loads | no figure | Hundreds of uses |
| Published weight | 0.32 lb for five | 7.5 lb for twenty pieces | 1.23 lb for twelve | 1.51 lb for four | 0.4 lb for eight |
| Trimming to fit stated | Can be cut to any size | not published | Trims with household scissors | not applicable, steel | Can be cut to any size and shape |
| Anything else in the purchase | nothing else | A silicone spatula | A recipe guide sent after purchase | nothing else | nothing else |
What the table cannot tell you is how long anything takes. Not one listing in twenty-four publishes a drying time, at any temperature, for any food. The claims are all comparative with nothing to compare against, so the honest reading is that a liner changes airflow and handling and the machine still decides the hours.
GUCUJI is the only maker here that measures the thing it says does the work. Its mesh holes are published at around 1×1 mm, stated to promote fast, even drying with airflow from above and below, and to stop blueberries and raspberries dropping through while liquid still drains. The sheet itself is published at 0.8 mm thick, written also as 30 mil.
That is a specification rather than an adjective, and it is the only one of its kind in this pool. CiCixixi publishes micro-hole screens that boost airflow and shorten drying time, with no hole size and no idea what micro means. Lova publishes a tight mesh weave. XZZWLL publishes excellent air circulation. None gives a number.
The four remaining claims are not even about the same clock. Baderke says four trays let you dry different foods at the same time without mixing flavors, which saves an hour you would have spent running a second load. XZZWLL says a rinse under warm water is enough and no scrubbing or soaking is required, which saves the washing up instead.
Lova makes the third kind of claim. Twelve liners exist so that every rack in the machine can be lined in one go rather than reusing three liners across six shelves, and the listing says plainly what that avoids: pausing to wash mid load. It is the only one of the five that names the interruption it removes.
The counts here split into two ideas. Lova publishes twelve sheets at 14 by 14 inches and XZZWLL publishes eight at 13 inches across, both of them betting that you want the whole machine lined at once. GUCUJI publishes five at 12.6 inches. Baderke publishes four steel trays, and the steel is the tray rather than a liner for one.
CiCixixi publishes the odd one: ten solid mats with a raised lip and ten mesh screens, which is two products in one purchase at 11.81 by 9.84 inches. A puree load and a berry load need different surfaces, and it is the only pick here that supplies both rather than asking you to choose one and buy the other later.
Baderke sits in this comparison a little awkwardly and the listing is clear about why. These are 304 stainless trays at 12 by 13 inches, compatible with the CP267-FD and stated to be compatible with that model only. They are the rack itself, so they add drying area to the machine rather than protecting the rack you already own.
That matters for a weekday routine because the two do different work. Four extra racks mean a bigger single load. Twelve silicone liners mean the racks you have can carry small or wet food without losing it through the grate. The Baderke listing publishes 1.51 pounds for its four trays, the only steel in these five.
Lova publishes the most useful sentence in the pool and it is a limitation. Its mesh is designed for solid foods, and for purees, yogurt or fruit leather the listing tells you to use a solid-surface liner instead. That is a maker ruling itself out of half the job, in writing, on its own product page.
Three of these five are mesh only. GUCUJI states liquids drain easily through its 1×1 mm holes, which is either a feature or the same warning phrased kindly. XZZWLL names fruit leather among its uses while publishing a mesh sheet with a 1.6 inch center hole. Only CiCixixi ships a raised lip mat for the wet loads.
CiCixixi publishes 7.5 pounds, the heaviest purchase of these five, and the count is the reason rather than any thickness. The set is ten raised lip mats and ten mesh screens at a stated 11.81 by 9.84 inches, plus a spatula, so one figure covers twenty pieces and the maker publishes nothing per sheet. Baderke publishes 1.51 pounds for its four steel trays.
The dimension fields need more care than the weights across this pool. GUCUJI and XZZWLL have had their unit fields emptied because those figures measured the carton, and both are cited above from the maker’s own words instead. GUCUJI publishes 13 by 13 by 0.1 inches for a box of five sheets each 12.6 inches across.
You want a figure rather than a promise. GUCUJI publishes mesh holes around 1×1 mm, a 12.6 inch diameter, 0.8 mm thickness and over 5,000 uses, and states the holes are what make the drying fast and even. It is 0.32 lb for five.
You dry puree one night and berries the next. CiCixixi publishes ten solid mats with a raised lip and ten mesh screens at 11.81 by 9.84 inches, plus a silicone spatula, so both surfaces are in one purchase and no second order is needed.
You want every rack lined in one go. Lova publishes twelve sheets at 14 by 14 inches, states they exist so you never pause to wash mid load, and trims with household scissors. It also states its mesh is wrong for puree.
You want more drying area, not more liners. Baderke publishes four 304 stainless trays at 12 by 13 inches for the CP267-FD only, stated to let you dry different foods at once without mixing flavors. The listing publishes 1.51 lb for the four.
You mind the washing up more than the drying. XZZWLL publishes eight mesh sheets at 13 inches across with a 1.6 inch center hole, and states a rinse in warm water or a dishwasher run is enough, with no scrubbing or soaking. It is 0.4 lb for eight.
Every figure above is a manufacturer’s own published number or sentence, taken from the listing itself. These are the things we went looking for across all twenty-four listings on this fact sheet and could not find in any of them.