Lush Food & Drink

Buying Guide ·Storage

Best Produce Storage Containers for Clearly Listed Dimensions

The deciding factor is whether the maker publishes a complete set of outer dimensions, and whether those figures agree with the maker's own words.

By the Lush Editorial Team·Researched & Compared

  • Researched & ComparedSpecs pulled from the manufacturer listing
  • Like-for-LikeSame measures across every model
  • No Paid PlacementsNobody pays to appear here

Compared the published dimensions, weights, and feature text of 16 food storage containers from the fact sheet, focusing on which makers state a full set of outer measurements.

Our shortlist

Five products, one set of published numbers.
  1. JSCARES 40 PCS Food Storage Containers with Lids Air...
    Best for a stated size in the text

    JSCARES 40 PCS Food Storage Containers with Lids Air...

    The maker states 9.7 by 9 inches in the product text and publishes 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches as the outer set.

    • JSCARES
    • 9.7 inches x 9 inches
    • 0.66 lb
  2. Buddeez Bulk Food Storage Container 8 Quart All Purp...
    Best for bulk dry goods

    Buddeez Bulk Food Storage Container 8 Quart All Purp...

    Publishes 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats the figures in the title, with a flip lid and pour spout.

    • Buddeez
    • 13.5x11.5x5.5 Inch (Pack of 1)
    • 1.22 lb
  3. Souso 6pcs Stainless Steel Stacking Food Containers ...
    Best for small snack portions

    Souso 6pcs Stainless Steel Stacking Food Containers ...

    Publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches and states 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches in the text, a compact six-piece set.

    • souso
    • 5.43" L x 2.24" W x 5.43" H
    • 1.06 lb
  4. Collapsible Food Storage Containers with Airtight Li...
    Best collapsible option with figures

    Collapsible Food Storage Containers with Airtight Li...

    Publishes 3.9 by 6.4 by 2.4 inches and states 6.4 by 3.9 inches, a collapsible silicone set that saves space.

    • Annaklin
    • 6.4" x "3.9" inches, 27 oz
    • 1 lb
  5. Sustainable Containables Stainless Steel Food Storag...
    Best stainless steel set with figures

    Sustainable Containables Stainless Steel Food Storag...

    Publishes 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches, a nested three-piece stainless set with silicone lids.

    • Sustainable Containables
    • Small Medium Large Set
    • 1.34 lb

Side by side

Blank means the maker does not publish it.
ModelBrandSize (capacity)WeightBest for
JSCARES 40 PCS Food Storage Containers with Lids Air... JSCARES 9.7 inches x 9 inches 0.66 lb Best for a stated size in the text
Buddeez Bulk Food Storage Container 8 Quart All Purp... Buddeez 13.5x11.5x5.5 Inch (Pack of 1) 1.22 lb Best for bulk dry goods
Souso 6pcs Stainless Steel Stacking Food Containers ... souso 5.43" L x 2.24" W x 5.43" H 1.06 lb Best for small snack portions
Collapsible Food Storage Containers with Airtight Li... Annaklin 6.4" x "3.9" inches, 27 oz 1 lb Best collapsible option with figures
Sustainable Containables Stainless Steel Food Storag... Sustainable Containables Small Medium Large Set 1.34 lb Best stainless steel set with figures

Each pick in detail

What the listing says for it, and against it.
1 Best for a stated size in the text

JSCARES 40 PCS Food Storage Containers with Lids Air...

The maker states 9.7 by 9 inches in the product text and publishes 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches as the outer set.

  • For it
  • Publishes width, depth, and height as 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches
  • States a size of 9.7 by 9 inches in the product text
  • Includes 20 containers in two shapes and multiple sizes
  • Airtight seal with silicone rings, leakproof according to the maker
  • Against it
  • Weight is listed as 0.66 pounds, which is very light for 40 pieces
  • The stated 9.7 by 9 inches does not match the published 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches exactly
2 Best for bulk dry goods

Buddeez Bulk Food Storage Container 8 Quart All Purp...

Publishes 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats the figures in the title, with a flip lid and pour spout.

  • For it
  • Publishes 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats the figures in the title
  • 8-quart capacity for bulk dry goods
  • Flip lid with a wide opening and an EZ Pour spout
  • BPA-free and top-rack dishwasher safe
  • Against it
  • Weight is published as 1.22 pounds, but the empty container weight is not separated from packaging
  • No mention of airtightness for long-term storage
3 Best for small snack portions

Souso 6pcs Stainless Steel Stacking Food Containers ...

Publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches and states 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches in the text, a compact six-piece set.

  • For it
  • Publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches
  • States 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches in the text, close to the published figures
  • Six-piece set with stackable design
  • Stainless steel box with plastic lid
  • Against it
  • The stated text dimensions do not match the published width and depth exactly
  • Weight is published as 1.06 pounds for the set, but per-container weight is not given
4 Best collapsible option with figures

Collapsible Food Storage Containers with Airtight Li...

Publishes 3.9 by 6.4 by 2.4 inches and states 6.4 by 3.9 inches, a collapsible silicone set that saves space.

  • For it
  • Publishes 3.9 by 6.4 by 2.4 inches
  • States 6.4 by 3.9 inches in the text, matching the published width and depth
  • Collapsible design saves space according to the maker
  • Set of four, 27 ounces each
  • Against it
  • Weight is published as 1.0 pound for the set, but individual weight is not stated
  • The maker notes that pressing down on the lid may collapse the container
5 Best stainless steel set with figures

Sustainable Containables Stainless Steel Food Storag...

Publishes 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches, a nested three-piece stainless set with silicone lids.

  • For it
  • Publishes 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches
  • Nested three-piece set in 20, 30, and 40 ounce sizes
  • Stainless steel with clear platinum silicone lids
  • Freezer, oven, and dishwasher safe according to the maker
  • Against it
  • Weight is published as 1.34 pounds for the set, but per-piece weight is not given
  • No size stated in the text beyond the set description

Our verdict

For produce storage where you need to know the footprint before you buy, the JSCARES 40-piece set is the only pick that publishes width, depth, and height (7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches) and also states a size in its text. The Buddeez 8-quart container publishes 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats it in the title. The souso 6-piece set publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches. The Annaklin 27-ounce set publishes 3.9 by 6.4 by 2.4 inches. The Sustainable Containables set publishes 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches. Five others state nothing.

“Five makers publish a full set; the rest leave you guessing.”

Lush Editorial Team

What separates these five

Full dimension set JSCARES, Buddeez, souso, Annaklin, and Sustainable Containables each publish a width, depth, and height. The other eleven products on the sheet leave at least one of those figures blank.
Text and figures agree The souso and Annaklin listings state dimensions in the text that match their published width and depth. The JSCARES text states 9.7 by 9 inches, which is close to but not identical to its published 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches.
What the numbers mean A published width, depth, and height let you check a cabinet shelf or fridge bin before ordering. When a maker states nothing, you cannot confirm the footprint from the listing alone.
Weight is separate Weight is published for all five picks, but it is the shipping weight or set weight, not the empty weight of a single container. Use it to compare sets, not to judge how heavy one container will feel.
Capacity is stated Each pick states a capacity in its title or features: 40 pieces in various sizes, 8 quarts, 6 pieces at 5.4 by 4.3 by 2.2 inches, 27 ounces each, and 20/30/40 ounces nested. Capacity is unambiguous and can be compared directly.

How we chose

Priorities, not a computed score. The inputs are published specifications, so we rank by what matters most and say how much.

  1. 30% Full dimension setWithout all three outer figures you cannot check a shelf or bin, so this carries the most weight.
  2. 25% Text agreementA maker whose own words contradict its published figures is less reliable, so agreement matters.
  3. 20% Weight publishedA stated weight helps compare sets, though it is not the same as the empty weight of one container.
  4. 15% Capacity statedCapacity is unambiguous and lets you compare how much food each set holds.
  5. 10% Material and careMaterial and cleaning instructions affect daily use but do not decide the footprint.

How the Five Compare on the Numbers

Only five products on the sheet publish a width, a depth, and a height. The JSCARES set gives 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches and states 9.7 by 9 inches in its text. The Buddeez container gives 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats those figures in its title. The souso set gives 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches. The Annaklin set gives 3.9 by 6.4 by 2.4 inches. The Sustainable Containables set gives 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches. The other eleven products leave at least one of those figures blank, so they cannot be checked against a shelf or bin.

Weights are published for all five picks, but they are set or shipping weights, not the empty weight of one container. The JSCARES set is listed at 0.66 pounds for 40 pieces, the Buddeez at 1.22 pounds, the souso at 1.06 pounds, the Annaklin at 1.0 pound, and the Sustainable Containables at 1.34 pounds. Capacity is stated for each: 40 pieces in various sizes, 8 quarts, 6 pieces, 27 ounces each, and 20/30/40 ounces nested. These figures are unambiguous and can be compared directly.

Specification JSCARES 40-piece Buddeez 8-quart souso 6-piece Annaklin 27-ounce Sustainable Containables 3-piece
Width (inches) 7.0 5.5 4.3 3.9 5.46
Depth (inches) 9.7 11.5 5.4 6.4 7.53
Height (inches) 9.0 13.5 2.2 2.4 2.21
Weight (pounds) 0.66 1.22 1.06 1.0 1.34
Capacity 40 pieces, various sizes 8 quarts 6 pieces 27 ounces each 20/30/40 ounces nested
Size stated in text 9.7 by 9 inches 13.5 by 11.5 by 5.5 inches 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches 6.4 by 3.9 inches not published
Material Plastic Plastic Stainless steel and plastic Silicone Stainless steel and silicone
Airtight claim Yes, leakproof Not stated Not stated Yes, airtight Yes, airtight and leakproof

The table does not tell you whether the published figures are outer or inner dimensions, except where the maker says so. The souso listing states outer and inner sizes for a different product, not for this set. The JSCARES text gives a size that is close to but not identical to its published figures. The Buddeez title repeats the published figures but does not say which is height and which is length. These ambiguities remain even with a full set of numbers.

What the Published Figures Cover

Outer dimensions versus inner space

The five picks publish a width, a depth, and a height, but most do not say whether those figures describe the outside of the container or the space inside. The JSCARES listing states 9.7 by 9 inches in the text without labeling it as outer or inner. The souso listing states 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches in the text but publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches, and the maker does not explain the difference. For produce storage, the outer figure is what fits a shelf; the inner figure is what holds the food.

The Sustainable Containables listing does not state a size in the text at all, so its published 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches cannot be cross-checked against the maker’s words. The Annaklin listing states 6.4 by 3.9 inches, which matches its published width and depth, but the height of 2.4 inches is not repeated in the text. When a maker states only two of the three figures in the text, the third remains unconfirmed even though it is published.

Weight and capacity as separate figures

Weight is published for all five picks, but it is the weight of the set or the shipping weight, not the empty weight of one container. The JSCARES set is listed at 0.66 pounds for 40 pieces, which is very light for that many containers. The Sustainable Containables set is listed at 1.34 pounds for three pieces. These figures can help you compare sets, but they do not tell you how heavy a single container will feel when filled with produce.

Capacity is stated for each pick and is unambiguous. The Buddeez container holds 8 quarts, the Annaklin set holds 27 ounces per container, and the Sustainable Containables set nests 20, 30, and 40 ounce sizes. The JSCARES set includes 20 containers in two shapes and multiple sizes, from 8 ounces to 51 ounces according to the maker. Capacity can be compared directly, while weight cannot be used to judge a single container.

Where the Listings Disagree With Themselves

Text versus published figures

The JSCARES listing states a size of 9.7 by 9 inches in the text but publishes 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches as the outer dimensions. The two sets of figures share the 9.7 inch depth but differ in width and height. The maker does not explain whether the text size refers to a single container or to the set. A buyer checking a shelf opening should use the published figures, but the discrepancy means the listing is not fully consistent.

The souso listing states 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches in the text but publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches. The text figures are larger in two dimensions and smaller in one. The maker does not say which set is outer and which is inner. The Annaklin listing states 6.4 by 3.9 inches, which matches its published width and depth, so that listing is consistent for those two figures. The height of 2.4 inches is published but not repeated in the text.

What the maker does not state

The Buddeez listing publishes 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats those figures in the title, but it does not say which figure is the height and which is the length. The container is tall and narrow, but the orientation is not confirmed. The Sustainable Containables listing publishes 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches but does not state a size in the text, so the figures stand alone without a cross-check.

None of the five picks states the empty weight of a single container. The JSCARES listing gives 0.66 pounds for 40 pieces, which is likely a shipping weight. The Buddeez listing gives 1.22 pounds for one container, which may include packaging. These figures are published, but they do not answer the question of how much a single empty container weighs. For produce storage, that figure matters less than the outer dimensions.

Which One Fits Your Kitchen

If you need a large set with a stated size in the text, the JSCARES 40-piece set publishes 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches and states 9.7 by 9 inches. It includes 20 containers in two shapes and multiple sizes, from 8 ounces to 51 ounces.

If you store bulk dry goods and want a flip lid, the Buddeez 8-quart container publishes 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats those figures in the title. It has a wide opening for scooping and an EZ Pour spout.

If you pack small snack portions, the souso 6-piece set publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches and states 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches. It is a compact stainless steel set with plastic lids.

If you want a collapsible option with published figures, the Annaklin 27-ounce set publishes 3.9 by 6.4 by 2.4 inches and states 6.4 by 3.9 inches. The maker says the collapsible design saves space.

If you prefer stainless steel with silicone lids, the Sustainable Containables 3-piece set publishes 5.46 by 7.53 by 2.21 inches. It nests 20, 30, and 40 ounce sizes and states airtight, leakproof lids.

What We Could Not Verify

The following facts were not published in the listings we compared, and we did not estimate them.

  • The empty weight of a single container is not published for any of the five picks.
  • The JSCARES listing does not explain why its stated 9.7 by 9 inches differs from its published 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches.
  • The souso listing does not say whether its stated 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches are outer or inner dimensions.
  • The Sustainable Containables listing does not state a size in the text, so its published figures cannot be cross-checked.
  • The Buddeez listing does not say which of its published figures is the height and which is the length.
  • None of the five picks states the inner dimensions of the containers, only the outer figures where published.

Frequently asked questions

Why does a full set of dimensions matter for produce storage?+

Produce containers often go into a fridge bin, a cabinet shelf, or a drawer with a fixed opening. A published width, depth, and height let you check that opening before you order. When a maker leaves one figure blank, you cannot confirm the footprint from the listing, and you may have to return the item or store it elsewhere.

Which pick publishes the most complete set of figures?+

The JSCARES 40-piece set publishes width, depth, and height as 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches and also states a size of 9.7 by 9 inches in the text. The Buddeez 8-quart container publishes 5.5 by 11.5 by 13.5 inches and repeats those figures in the title. Both give you three outer figures to work with.

Do the stated sizes in the text always match the published figures?+

No. The souso listing states 5.43 by 2.24 by 5.43 inches in the text but publishes 4.3 by 5.4 by 2.2 inches. The JSCARES listing states 9.7 by 9 inches but publishes 7.0 by 9.7 by 9.0 inches. The Annaklin listing states 6.4 by 3.9 inches, which matches its published width and depth. Always check both places.

Can I compare weights across these five picks?+

The weights are published, but they are set or shipping weights, not the empty weight of one container. The JSCARES set is listed at 0.66 pounds for 40 pieces, which is very light, while the Sustainable Containables set is listed at 1.34 pounds for three pieces. Use these figures to compare sets, not to judge how heavy a single container will feel.

What should I do if a maker does not publish dimensions?+

If a maker states nothing, you cannot confirm the footprint from the listing. You could contact the seller, but this guide cannot verify what they tell you. For produce storage where fit matters, choose a pick that publishes a full set of outer figures, such as the JSCARES, Buddeez, souso, Annaklin, or Sustainable Containables sets.

Are these containers airtight?+

The makers describe airtight or leakproof seals for several picks. The JSCARES set states a 100 percent leakproof seal with silicone rings. The Sustainable Containables set states airtight, leakproof lids. The souso set does not state airtightness. The Buddeez container has a flip lid but the maker does not claim an airtight seal. Check the features for the specific claim.

Specifications come from the manufacturers' own published listings. Lush Food & Drink may earn a commission if you buy through a link on this page, at no extra cost to you. How we research.