Lush Food & Drink

Buying Guide ·Measurement

Best Measuring Spoons for a Small Baking Station

The deciding specification is how the set stores and whether the bowl fits a spice jar, and only two listings address either.

By the Lush Editorial Team·Researched & Compared

  • Researched & ComparedSpecs pulled from the manufacturer listing
  • Like-for-LikeSame measures across every model
  • No Paid PlacementsNobody pays to appear here

I compared piece counts, listed sizes, marking methods, storage mechanisms, steel grades and published weights across eight measuring spoon listings, using only the makers' own text.

Our shortlist

Five products, one set of published numbers.
  1. Spring Chef Stainless Steel Magnetic Measuring Spoon...
    Best for measuring straight from a spice jar

    Spring Chef Stainless Steel Magnetic Measuring Spoon...

    Seven sizes from 1/8 teaspoon to 1 tablespoon plus a leveler, with dual sided bowls, a narrow oval end stated to fit most spice jars and a round end for liquids, US and metric markings, single metal construction and magnetic nesting instead of a ring, at 0.44 pounds.

    • Spring Chef
    • 1-Pack
    • 0.44 lb
  2. Hudson Essentials Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons S...
    Best for the smallest stack in a drawer

    Hudson Essentials Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons S...

    Seven pieces in 18/8 food grade stainless steel, square and narrow to fit most spice containers, nesting inside one another with no ring and no magnet, with measurements stamped on every handle and dishwasher use stated, though no weight or dimension is published.

    • Hudson Essentials
    • 7 Piece Measuring Spoon Set
    • Weight not listed
  3. U-Taste 18/8 Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons Set of...
    Best for nine sizes on one ring

    U-Taste 18/8 Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons Set of...

    A set of 9 in 18/8 stainless steel with deeply engraved markings stated to remain intact, thicker handles stated not to bend, a D-ring for nesting and dishwasher use stated even with the dry cycle on, at 0.42 pounds, with the nine sizes never listed.

    • U-Taste
    • 4.9in
    • 0.42 lb
  4. OXO Good Grips 4 Piece Stainless Steel Measuring Spo...
    Best for recipes written in milliliters

    OXO Good Grips 4 Piece Stainless Steel Measuring Spo...

    Four spoons marked 1.25 mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL and 15 mL alongside their teaspoon and tablespoon equivalents, with permanent etched markings, magnetic snaps in the handles, soft non slip grips and a stated design intent of making leveling easy, at 0.28 pounds.

    • OXO
    • 4 count
    • 0.28 lb
  5. TILUCK Stainless Steel Measuring Cups & Spoons Set
    Best if you need cups as well

    TILUCK Stainless Steel Measuring Cups & Spoons Set

    Four measuring cups from 1/4 to 1 cup and six spoons from 1/8 teaspoon to 1 tablespoon that stack together, published at 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches and 0.8 pounds, with cups in 18/8 stainless steel, sizes engraved on every piece and the set stated dishwasher safe.

    • TILUCK
    • Medium
    • 0.8 lb

Side by side

Blank means the maker does not publish it.
ModelBrandSize (capacity)WeightBest for
Spring Chef Stainless Steel Magnetic Measuring Spoon... Spring Chef 1-Pack 0.44 lb Best for measuring straight from a spice jar
Hudson Essentials Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons S... Hudson Essentials 7 Piece Measuring Spoon Set not published Best for the smallest stack in a drawer
U-Taste 18/8 Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons Set of... U-Taste 4.9in 0.42 lb Best for nine sizes on one ring
OXO Good Grips 4 Piece Stainless Steel Measuring Spo... OXO 4 count 0.28 lb Best for recipes written in milliliters
TILUCK Stainless Steel Measuring Cups & Spoons Set TILUCK Medium 0.8 lb Best if you need cups as well

Each pick in detail

What the listing says for it, and against it.
1 Best for measuring straight from a spice jar

Spring Chef Stainless Steel Magnetic Measuring Spoon...

Seven sizes from 1/8 teaspoon to 1 tablespoon plus a leveler, with dual sided bowls, a narrow oval end stated to fit most spice jars and a round end for liquids, US and metric markings, single metal construction and magnetic nesting instead of a ring, at 0.44 pounds.

  • For it
  • Dual sided bowls, a narrow oval end for spice jars and a round end for liquids
  • Seven sizes including 3/4 teaspoon and 1/2 tablespoon
  • A leveler is included and counted as the eighth piece
  • Magnetic nesting, so a single spoon lifts off without unclipping a ring
  • Against it
  • Names no steel grade beyond heavy duty premium stainless steel
  • Makes no dishwasher statement at all
  • Does not say how the markings are applied, only that they are there
2 Best for the smallest stack in a drawer

Hudson Essentials Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons S...

Seven pieces in 18/8 food grade stainless steel, square and narrow to fit most spice containers, nesting inside one another with no ring and no magnet, with measurements stamped on every handle and dishwasher use stated, though no weight or dimension is published.

  • For it
  • Seven pieces nest inside one another with no ring or magnet to store
  • Square and narrow bowls stated to fit easily in most spice containers
  • 18/8 food grade stainless steel, stated rust proof and corrosion proof
  • Measurements stamped on every handle
  • Against it
  • Publishes no weight, the only set here with no figure of any kind
  • Publishes no dimension either, so the stack cannot be checked against a drawer
  • Nothing holds the stack together, so a rummaged drawer scatters it
3 Best for nine sizes on one ring

U-Taste 18/8 Stainless Steel Measuring Spoons Set of...

A set of 9 in 18/8 stainless steel with deeply engraved markings stated to remain intact, thicker handles stated not to bend, a D-ring for nesting and dishwasher use stated even with the dry cycle on, at 0.42 pounds, with the nine sizes never listed.

  • For it
  • Nine pieces, the largest spoon count in this pool
  • 18/8 stainless steel with deeply engraved markings stated to remain intact
  • Thicker handles, stated not to bend under sugar
  • Dishwasher safe including the dry cycle, stated explicitly
  • Against it
  • Never lists which nine sizes are in the set
  • Publishes a size field of 4.9 in with nothing to say what it measures
  • Its bullets quote percentages of shoppers with problems, which are marketing rather than specification
4 Best for recipes written in milliliters

OXO Good Grips 4 Piece Stainless Steel Measuring Spo...

Four spoons marked 1.25 mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL and 15 mL alongside their teaspoon and tablespoon equivalents, with permanent etched markings, magnetic snaps in the handles, soft non slip grips and a stated design intent of making leveling easy, at 0.28 pounds.

  • For it
  • The only set here that publishes metric volumes, 1.25 mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL and 15 mL
  • Permanent etched markings
  • Magnetic snaps in the handles keep the set nested
  • Soft non slip handles, which no other listing here offers
  • Against it
  • Four spoons only, with nothing below 1/4 teaspoon
  • No 3/4 teaspoon and no 1/2 tablespoon, so those have to be built from two spoons
  • Names no steel grade
5 Best if you need cups as well

TILUCK Stainless Steel Measuring Cups & Spoons Set

Four measuring cups from 1/4 to 1 cup and six spoons from 1/8 teaspoon to 1 tablespoon that stack together, published at 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches and 0.8 pounds, with cups in 18/8 stainless steel, sizes engraved on every piece and the set stated dishwasher safe.

  • For it
  • The only listing here that publishes a dimension for the stored set, 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches
  • Ten pieces covering both cups and spoons in one purchase
  • Cups stated in 18/8 stainless steel, spoons in premium food grade stainless steel
  • Sizes engraved on every cup and every spoon
  • Against it
  • At 0.8 pounds for ten pieces it is the largest thing here to store
  • States no bowl shape, so spice jar fit is unaddressed
  • Nothing holds the stack together beyond the nesting itself

Our verdict

Spring Chef is the set to buy for a small bench: seven sizes plus a leveler, magnetic nesting instead of a ring, and dual sided bowls with a narrow oval end for spice jars. Hudson Essentials nests seven square spoons with no fastener at all. U-Taste puts nine on a D-ring but never says which nine. OXO gives four spoons in milliliters. TILUCK stacks four cups and six spoons into 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches.

“The bowl either goes into the jar or it does not.”

Lush Editorial Team

What separates these five

Two listings share one text ChefAide's five bullets are Spring Chef's sentences word for word. Same eight pieces, same leveler, a different published weight.
Three ways to keep a set together Magnetic nesting on two sets, a D-ring on one, and plain stacking with no fastener on two.
Only two state a bowl shape Spring Chef is oval one end and round the other. Hudson is square and narrow. The other three never say.
One dimension, for a set of ten TILUCK publishes 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches. No spoon only set here publishes a stack height or a handle length.
Marking method is usually stated Etched, engraved and stamped across four of the five. Spring Chef states markings exist without saying how.

How we chose

Priorities, not a computed score. The inputs are published specifications, so we rank by what matters most and say how much.

  1. 30% How the set stores and comes apartOn a small baking station the set spends almost all its life stacked. A magnetic stack releases one spoon and holds the rest; a D-ring drags the whole set along with the spoon you are using; a plain nest stores smallest of all and scatters when the drawer is rummaged. All three are defensible and they are not the same tool.
  2. 25% Whether the bowl fits a spice jarThis is the difference between measuring cumin and spilling it. Two of these five state a bowl shape and both make the jar claim explicitly, one with a narrow oval end and one with a square narrow bowl. The other three never mention the shape of the part that does the work.
  3. 20% Which sizes are actually in the setA 3/4 teaspoon saves a second spoon and a second wash, and a 1/8 teaspoon matters for salt and baking soda. One set here stops at 1/4 teaspoon, two list seven sizes including both, and one publishes a count of nine without ever saying what they are.
  4. 15% How the markings are appliedA painted number fades and the spoon becomes a guess. Etched, engraved and stamped all survive a dishwasher, and four of these five say which they use. It is the single best predictor of whether a set is still usable after years of washing.
  5. 10% Steel grade and handle construction18/8 is stated by three listings and means a known corrosion resistance. Two name no grade at all. Handle construction matters just as much: a thin handle bends when you push it into packed brown sugar, and two listings address that directly.

How the Five Compare on the Numbers

Three listings were left out and one of them is worth explaining. ChefAide publishes a set of 8 magnetic dual sided spoons whose five feature bullets are the same sentences as Spring Chef’s, opening with the same line about treating yourself to a set worth having. Same pieces, same leveler, same dual sided description. The only published figure that differs is the weight: 0.53 pounds against Spring Chef’s 0.44. One listing is enough for that product.

Rena Chris and Le Creuset were also set aside. Rena Chris is six round scoops on a D-ring, a narrower version of what U-Taste does with nine. Le Creuset publishes five sizes, a polished finish, heavy gauge steel and a size field reading 8 inches, with nothing anywhere in the listing to say what is 8 inches long. On a page about fitting a small baking station, an unexplained dimension is not usable.

Specification Spring Chef eight piece U-Taste nine piece Hudson Essentials seven piece OXO Good Grips four piece TILUCK cups and spoons
Pieces in the set Seven spoons plus a leveler Nine Seven Four Four cups and six spoons
Sizes listed by the maker 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and 1 tsp, then 1/2 and 1 tbsp not published 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and 1 tsp, then 1/2 and 1 tbsp 1/4, 1/2 and 1 tsp, then 1 tbsp Cups 1/4, 1/3, 1/2 and 1, spoons 1/8, 1/4, 1/2 and 1 tsp with 1/2 and 1 tbsp
Metric equivalents given US and metric markings stated not published not published 1.25 mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL and 15 mL not published
How the markings are applied not published Deeply engraved, stated to remain intact Stamped on every handle Permanent and etched Engraved on every cup and spoon
How the set stays together Magnetic, so they nest without a ring A D-ring Stackable, each piece nests inside another Magnetic snaps in the handles Stackable
Bowl shape stated Dual sided, a narrow oval end and a round end not published Square and narrow not published not published
Steel grade stated Heavy duty premium stainless steel, no grade 18/8 18/8 food grade Stainless steel, no grade Cups in 18/8, spoons in premium food grade
Help with leveling A leveler is included in the count not published not published Stated as designed to make leveling easy not published
Handle detail Single metal construction Thicker handles, stated not to bend not published Soft, non slip handles not published
Dishwasher stated not published Hand or dishwasher, dry cycle included Dishwasher safe not published Dishwasher safe
Published weight 0.44 lb for eight pieces 0.42 lb for nine not published 0.28 lb for four 0.8 lb for ten pieces
Any dimension published not published 4.9 in, with nothing to say what it measures not published not published 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 in
Spice jar claim The oval end fits most spice jars not published Fits easily in most spice containers not published not published

What the table cannot tell you is the figure a small baking station actually needs, which is how much drawer or shelf the nested set occupies. Only TILUCK publishes a dimension for the whole stack, at 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches, and that is a set of ten with cups in it. Not one of the four spoon only sets publishes a nested height, a handle length, or a bowl diameter.

How a Set Stores on a Crowded Bench

Magnets Against a Ring

Spring Chef and OXO both solve storage with magnets and describe it differently. Spring Chef says the spoons nest together magnetically so you can take one at a time without fumbling with opening and closing a ring, which is an argument aimed squarely at the D-ring sets. OXO says its magnetic handles keep the spoons nested for storage, and pairs that with soft non slip handles.

U-Taste keeps the D-ring and defends it, stating that the ring lets the spoons nest together to save storage space. Both approaches make a stack. The practical difference shows up when you are measuring three things in a row: a magnetic stack comes apart and goes back one spoon at a time, while a ring means the whole set travels with whichever spoon you are holding, wet or dry.

Nesting With No Fastener at All

Hudson Essentials takes the third route and simply lets each of its seven pieces nest inside another, with no ring and no magnet, stating that the stack will store in any drawer, cabinet or cupboard. That is the smallest possible storage commitment and the easiest to break up: nothing holds the stack together, so a drawer that gets rummaged will scatter it.

TILUCK is also stackable and is a different proposition, because the stack contains four measuring cups as well as six spoons. Its published 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches is the only figure in this pool that tells you what a stored set takes up, and it is the one to hold against a shelf if your baking station is a single cupboard rather than a drawer.

Whether the Spoon Fits the Jar

Two Listings Make the Claim, and Both Explain It

The daily annoyance with measuring spoons is that the bowl will not go into a spice jar, so you tip the jar over the spoon and spill half of it. Spring Chef addresses it directly: its spoons are dual sided, with a narrow oval end made to fit into most spice jars and a round end for liquids, and it states the point of that, which is that you save spice instead of shaking it across the counter.

Hudson Essentials makes the same claim by a different shape, stating that its square and narrow spoons fit easily in most spice containers. Neither publishes a bowl width, so both claims rest on the words most spice jars, and jars vary. What you can rely on is that both makers thought about it, which is more than U-Taste, OXO or TILUCK say on the subject.

Round, Oval and Square Bowls

Only two of the five state a bowl shape at all. Spring Chef states oval on one end and round on the other. Hudson states square and narrow. U-Taste, OXO and TILUCK publish no shape, which matters because the shape is what decides whether a spoon scoops out of a bag of flour cleanly or drags along the bottom of a shallow tin.

The excluded Rena Chris listing is instructive here, because it does state a shape, calling its scoops round and saying they fit into seasoning jars without spilling. That is the same claim Spring Chef and Hudson make, reached by a third shape, which tells you the claim is about the bowl being narrower than the jar mouth rather than about any particular geometry.

Sizes, Markings and Trusting the Number

Four Sizes or Nine

OXO publishes four spoons, 1/4, 1/2 and 1 teaspoon plus 1 tablespoon, and nothing smaller. Spring Chef and Hudson Essentials both publish the same seven sizes, adding 1/8 teaspoon, 3/4 teaspoon and 1/2 tablespoon. The 3/4 teaspoon is the one worth noticing: it is the size that stops you measuring a half and a quarter separately, which on a small bench is one fewer spoon to wash.

U-Taste publishes a set of 9 and never lists what the nine are, which is a strange omission for a set whose whole selling point is completeness. TILUCK lists all ten of its pieces, four cups from 1/4 to 1 and six spoons from 1/8 teaspoon to 1 tablespoon, so it is the only listing here that publishes a full inventory across both tools.

How the Markings Are Applied

This is the figure that decides whether a set is still usable in five years, and four of the five address it. OXO states permanent etched markings. U-Taste states deeply engraved markings that remain intact with repeated use. Hudson states measurements stamped on every handle. TILUCK states the size mark is engraved on every cup and spoon. Spring Chef states that US and metric markings are present without saying how.

U-Taste’s bullets are also where this pool gets strange, because they quote percentages of shoppers who had problems with other products, including 21.52 percent with faded painted measurements. Those figures are marketing rather than specification and nothing in the listing sources them. The useful part of the same bullet is the word engraved, and that is the part this page uses.

Which One Fits Your Kitchen

You measure spices straight from the jar. Spring Chef is dual sided, a narrow oval end for most spice jars and a round end for liquids, with seven sizes from 1/8 teaspoon to 1 tablespoon, a leveler, US and metric markings, and magnetic nesting instead of a ring. It is 0.44 pounds for eight pieces.

You want the most sizes on one ring. U-Taste publishes a set of 9 in 18/8 stainless steel with deeply engraved markings, thicker handles stated not to bend, a D-ring, and dishwasher use including the dry cycle, at 0.42 pounds. It never lists which nine sizes are in the set.

You want the smallest stack in the drawer. Hudson Essentials is seven pieces in 18/8 stainless steel that nest inside one another with no ring or magnet, square and narrow to fit most spice containers, with measurements stamped on every handle. It publishes no weight and no dimension.

You bake from recipes written in milliliters. OXO publishes four spoons marked 1.25 mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL and 15 mL, with permanent etched markings, magnetic snaps in the handles and soft non slip grips, at 0.28 pounds. It is the only set here that gives metric volumes explicitly.

You need cups as well and have one shelf. TILUCK is four cups and six spoons that stack, published at 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches and 0.8 pounds, with cups in 18/8 stainless steel, spoons in food grade stainless steel, sizes engraved on every piece and the whole set dishwasher safe.

What We Could Not Verify

These are the figures that would let you plan a small baking station around a set, and nearly all of them are missing.

  • No spoon only set publishes a nested stack height, a handle length or a bowl width, so none can be checked against a drawer.
  • U-Taste publishes a set of 9 without ever listing the nine sizes, and a size field of 4.9 in without saying what it measures.
  • Hudson Essentials publishes no weight at all, the only set here with no figure of any kind.
  • Spring Chef and OXO name no steel grade, while U-Taste, Hudson and TILUCK all state 18/8.
  • Spring Chef and OXO make no dishwasher statement, though both describe all metal construction.
  • Le Creuset, left out of the five, publishes a size field reading 8 inches with nothing in the listing to say what is 8 inches.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these fits into a spice jar?+

Two listings claim it and both explain how. Spring Chef states dual sided spoons with a narrow oval end made to fit most spice jars and a round end for liquids, and points out that this saves you shaking spice across the counter. Hudson Essentials states square and narrow bowls that fit easily in most spice containers. Neither publishes a bowl width, so the claim rests on the phrase most jars. U-Taste, OXO and TILUCK never mention bowl shape at all.

Are magnetic measuring spoons better than a D-ring?+

They solve the same problem differently. Spring Chef argues its case directly, saying magnetic nesting lets you take one spoon at a time without opening and closing a ring. OXO uses magnetic snaps in the handles for the same reason. U-Taste keeps the D-ring and states that it lets the set nest to save storage space. A ring means the whole set comes with the spoon you are holding; magnets mean the stack can drift apart in a drawer. Hudson avoids both and just nests.

How many measuring spoons do I actually need?+

It depends whether you want to stop doing arithmetic. OXO publishes four, 1/4, 1/2 and 1 teaspoon plus 1 tablespoon, which covers most recipes if you are willing to measure a 3/4 teaspoon as a half plus a quarter. Spring Chef and Hudson Essentials both publish seven sizes, adding 1/8 teaspoon, 3/4 teaspoon and 1/2 tablespoon. On a small bench the larger set is not obviously worse, because fewer combined measurements means fewer spoons in the sink.

Will the measurement markings wear off?+

Four of the five tell you how the markings are made, which is the figure to look for. OXO states permanent etched markings, U-Taste states deeply engraved markings that remain intact with repeated use, Hudson Essentials states measurements stamped on every handle, and TILUCK states the size is engraved on every cup and spoon. Spring Chef says US and metric markings are present but never says how they were applied, which is the one gap in an otherwise well documented listing.

Why are two of these listings identical?+

Because they appear to be the same product sold twice. ChefAide's set of 8 magnetic dual sided spoons carries the same five feature bullets as Spring Chef's set, sentence for sentence, down to the opening line about treating yourself to a set worth having. Same piece count, same leveler, same dual sided description. The published weights differ, 0.53 pounds against 0.44, which is the only measurable difference either listing offers. This page uses one of them.

Do any of these publish a size I can measure a shelf against?+

Only one. TILUCK publishes 2.9 by 3.5 by 5.5 inches, and that is for a set of ten pieces including four measuring cups, so it is the only figure here that tells you what a stored set occupies. None of the four spoon only sets publishes a nested height, a handle length or a bowl diameter. U-Taste publishes 4.9 inches without saying what it measures, and Le Creuset, which was left out, publishes 8 inches with the same silence.

Specifications come from the manufacturers' own published listings. Lush Food & Drink may earn a commission if you buy through a link on this page, at no extra cost to you. How we research.