Lush Food & Drink

Buying Guide ·Organization

Best Corner Cabinet Turntables for Stackable Design

The deciding specification is the figure each listing publishes for the pack itself, because that carton number is the only published measure of how flat a set of trays stores.

By the Lush Editorial Team·Researched & Compared

  • Researched & ComparedSpecs pulled from the manufacturer listing
  • Like-for-LikeSame measures across every model
  • No Paid PlacementsNobody pays to appear here

Five cabinet turntables compared on the pack figures, tray counts, stated sizes and stacking claims their own listings publish.

Our shortlist

Five products, one set of published numbers.
  1. Lazy Susan Turntable
    Best for four trays that store flat

    Lazy Susan Turntable

    Publishes 10 by 10 by 1.35 in for four 10 inch trays, against 2.56 in and 3.5 in for the other two packs that publish a figure, at a combined 3.44 lb.

    • CiWiVOKi
    • Gray 10 In 4 Pack
    • 3.44 lb
  2. LAMU 3 Pack Lazy Susan Organizer Turntable for Cabin...
    Best for three sizes that nest by design

    LAMU 3 Pack Lazy Susan Organizer Turntable for Cabin...

    Three trays at 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inches, published at 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in for the set and 2.3 lb.

    • LAMU
    • 3 Pack 12in+10.6in+9.25in
    • 2.3 lb
  3. LAMU 2 Tier Lazy Susan Turntable Organizer 9.25'' Ro...
    Best for stacking upward instead of flat

    LAMU 2 Tier Lazy Susan Turntable Organizer 9.25'' Ro...

    The only listing here that states units stack, two sets making a three tier column, with a stated 9.25 inch diameter and a 7.7 inch height.

    • LAMU
    • 9.25in 1 Pack
    • 0.99 lb
  4. Guzon 4 Pack Lazy Susan Turntable
    Best for carrying a tray off the stack

    Guzon 4 Pack Lazy Susan Turntable

    Four 11.5 inch trays with two handles each, published at 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in for the pack and 4.45 lb.

    • Guzon
    • 11.5"-4pc
    • 4.45 lb
  5. Set of 4
    Best for a non slip surface on every tray

    Set of 4

    Four 10 inch trays with a diamond silicone surface and anti slip feet, and a stated tray size of 10 by 1.4 inches.

    • LANDNEOO
    • 10 inch - 1 Tier - 4 Pack
    • Weight not listed

Side by side

Blank means the maker does not publish it.
ModelBrandSize (capacity)WeightBest for
Lazy Susan Turntable CiWiVOKi Gray 10 In 4 Pack 3.44 lb Best for four trays that store flat
LAMU 3 Pack Lazy Susan Organizer Turntable for Cabin... LAMU 3 Pack 12in+10.6in+9.25in 2.3 lb Best for three sizes that nest by design
LAMU 2 Tier Lazy Susan Turntable Organizer 9.25'' Ro... LAMU 9.25in 1 Pack 0.99 lb Best for stacking upward instead of flat
Guzon 4 Pack Lazy Susan Turntable Guzon 11.5"-4pc 4.45 lb Best for carrying a tray off the stack
Set of 4 LANDNEOO 10 inch - 1 Tier - 4 Pack not published Best for a non slip surface on every tray

Each pick in detail

What the listing says for it, and against it.
1 Best for four trays that store flat

Lazy Susan Turntable

Publishes 10 by 10 by 1.35 in for four 10 inch trays, against 2.56 in and 3.5 in for the other two packs that publish a figure, at a combined 3.44 lb.

  • For it
  • Publishes 10 by 10 by 1.35 in for a pack of four, against 2.56 in of carton depth for three LAMU trays and 3.5 in for four Guzon trays.
  • The carton figure and the stated 10 inch tray agree, so the number is credible as the pack.
  • States a beaded non skid surface and four silicone anti slip base feet on every tray.
  • Publishes 3.44 lb for the four and a clear care instruction: hand wash, then dry naturally without a dryer.
  • Against it
  • Publishes no tray height anywhere, so the carton depth of 1.35 in is the only clue to how thin one tray is.
  • Names no bearing or rotating mechanism at all.
  • Nothing is published in the dimension fields, only the 10 inch figure in the title.
2 Best for three sizes that nest by design

LAMU 3 Pack Lazy Susan Organizer Turntable for Cabin...

Three trays at 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inches, published at 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in for the set and 2.3 lb.

  • For it
  • Three trays at 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inches, which is the only set here designed around different sizes rather than repeats.
  • Publishes 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in for the set, so the carton holds the 12 inch tray it describes.
  • Publishes 2.3 lb for three trays and states a reinforced base with 360 degree rotation.
  • States three different raised edge sizes to match the three tray sizes.
  • Against it
  • None of the three raised edges is measured, so the useful tray area is not published.
  • One bullet calls the set acrylic while another calls it high quality plastic, and the listing does not resolve that.
  • No per tray weight and no tray height are published.
3 Best for stacking upward instead of flat

LAMU 2 Tier Lazy Susan Turntable Organizer 9.25'' Ro...

The only listing here that states units stack, two sets making a three tier column, with a stated 9.25 inch diameter and a 7.7 inch height.

  • For it
  • The only listing in this group that states a stacking design, saying two sets combine into a three tier column.
  • Publishes a complete size for the object itself: 9.25 inches in diameter and 7.7 inches tall in the maker own words.
  • States metal rods connecting the tiers rather than plastic, and a 1 inch raised edge.
  • States no tools are needed for assembly or removal, which is what makes a stacked column practical.
  • Against it
  • The height field reads 7.9 in while the maker own bullet says 7.7 inches, and nothing in the listing reconciles them.
  • Stacking two sets means buying twice, which the listing states plainly as a condition.
  • A single unit, so there is no pack figure and no spare trays.
4 Best for carrying a tray off the stack

Guzon 4 Pack Lazy Susan Turntable

Four 11.5 inch trays with two handles each, published at 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in for the pack and 4.45 lb.

  • For it
  • Two built in handles on every tray, the only handles in this group, so a tray lifts off a stack cleanly.
  • States stainless steel ball bearings and a high edge to hold items while spinning.
  • Publishes 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in for the pack of four and 11.5 inches for the tray.
  • States BPA free PE plastic described as fall resistant.
  • Against it
  • Its carton figure is 3.5 in deep against 1.35 in for the other pack of four, so the set stores less flat.
  • States in capitals that it must not go in a dishwasher.
  • Publishes 4.45 lb for the pack and no per tray figure.
5 Best for a non slip surface on every tray

Set of 4

Four 10 inch trays with a diamond silicone surface and anti slip feet, and a stated tray size of 10 by 1.4 inches.

  • For it
  • States a full tray size of 10 by 1.4 inches, which two of the other four packs do not do at all.
  • States a diamond shaped silicone non slip surface and anti slip base feet.
  • Names both materials, BPA free plastic and silicone, and gives a care instruction of hand wash and dry completely.
  • Also names an available size of 9.1 inches, so the format is offered smaller.
  • Against it
  • Its published pack figure of 3.94 by 4.72 by 0.79 in is smaller than the 10 inch tray the same listing describes, so it cannot be the carton for four of them.
  • Publishes no weight at all, for a tray or for the pack.
  • Names no bearing or rotating mechanism.

Our verdict

Four of these five arrive as a multipack, and the carton figure is the only published number for how flat the set stores. CiWiVOKi publishes 10 by 10 by 1.35 in for four 10 inch trays, LAMU 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in for three sizes and Guzon 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in for four. LANDNEOO publishes a figure too small to hold its own tray. Only the LAMU two tier unit states that units stack.

“The carton is the only published clue to how flat it stores.”

Lush Editorial Team

What separates these five

Carton depths from 1.35 to 3.5 inches CiWiVOKi publishes 1.35 in of carton depth for four trays, LAMU 2.56 in for three and Guzon 3.5 in for four. That is the only published measure of how flat each set stores.
One pack figure does not work LANDNEOO publishes 3.94 by 4.72 by 0.79 in for four 10 inch trays. A 10 inch tray does not go in it, so the figure is reported here and not used.
Only one listing stacks upward The LAMU two tier unit states that buying two sets gives a three tier column. Nothing else in this group describes stacking at all.
Three sizes against four repeats The LAMU three pack gives 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inch trays. CiWiVOKi, Guzon and LANDNEOO all give four identical trays instead.
What keeps a tray still CiWiVOKi states a beaded surface with four silicone feet and LANDNEOO a diamond silicone surface with anti slip feet. Guzon and LAMU rely on raised edges.

How we chose

Priorities, not a computed score. The inputs are published specifications, so we rank by what matters most and say how much.

  1. 30% Published pack figureA stackable set is judged on how little height it takes when stored, and the carton figure is the only number any of these publish for that.
  2. 25% What is in the packFour identical trays, three graduated sizes and one two tier unit are three different answers to the same cabinet.
  3. 20% Stated tray sizeTwo of these five publish a tray height as well as a diameter, and the other three leave the carton to stand in for it.
  4. 15% Stacking as statedExactly one listing describes units combining into a taller column, and it states the condition: you have to buy two.
  5. 10% Base, edge and handlesWhat stops a tray sliding, and whether there is anything to lift it by once it is on a shelf.

How the Five Compare on the Numbers

Four of these five are multipacks, and for a page about stacking the published carton figure is the useful number. CiWiVOKi publishes 10 by 10 by 1.35 in for four 10 inch trays. The LAMU three pack publishes 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in for trays of 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inches. Guzon publishes 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in for four 11.5 inch trays.

The fifth is a different object. The LAMU two tier unit publishes its own dimensions rather than a carton, 9.25 inches in diameter and 7.7 inches tall in the maker own words, and it is the only listing in the pool that states units stack: two sets make a three tier column. LANDNEOO publishes a pack figure that is smaller than its own tray.

Specification CiWiVOKi LAMU three pack LAMU two tier Guzon LANDNEOO
Published pack figure 10 x 10 x 1.35 in 11.81 x 11.81 x 2.56 in not applicable, a single unit 11.5 x 11.5 x 3.5 in 3.94 x 4.72 x 0.79 in
Trays in the pack Four at 10 in Three at 9.25, 10.6 and 12 in One two tier unit Four at 11.5 in Four at 10 in
Tray size the maker states 10 in in the title 9.25, 10.6 and 12 in 9.25 in diameter, 7.7 in tall 11.5 in 10 x 1.4 in
Dimension fields not published not published 9.25 x 9.25 x 7.9 in not published not published
Published weight 3.44 lb for four 2.3 lb for three 0.99 lb 4.45 lb for four not published
Stacking stated not published Three sizes in one set Two sets make a three tier column not published not published
Raised edge stated not published Three sizes, none measured 1 in High edge, not measured not published
Base treatment stated Beaded surface, four silicone feet Reinforced base not published not published Diamond silicone surface, anti slip feet
Bearing stated not published not published Ball bearings Stainless steel ball bearings not published
Handles stated not published not published not published Two on each tray not published
Material named Shatter resistant plastic Plastic, called acrylic in one bullet Plastic with metal rods PE, BPA free BPA free plastic and silicone
Cleaning instruction Hand wash, dry naturally Rinse or wipe with a damp towel Clean with water Mild soap and water, never a dishwasher Hand wash, dry completely

What the table cannot tell you is how tall one tray is on three of these five. CiWiVOKi, Guzon and the LAMU three pack all publish a diameter and a carton and no tray height, so the carton depth has to stand in for a figure the makers never gave. On a page about how flat a set stores, that is the gap that matters most.

What a Carton Figure Can and Cannot Tell You

Three Figures That Hold Together

CiWiVOKi publishes 10 by 10 by 1.35 in and states four 10 inch trays, so the footprint of the carton matches the tray and the depth is the part that describes the stack. The LAMU three pack publishes 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in and names a 12 inch tray, which fits. Guzon publishes 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in for four 11.5 inch trays, which also fits.

Read together those three say something useful. Four plain trays go into 1.35 in. Three graduated trays that nest go into 2.56 in. Four trays with handles and a high edge need 3.5 in. The features that make a tray easier to use are the same features that stop it storing flat, and the carton figures put numbers on that trade.

The Figure That Cannot Be Right

LANDNEOO publishes 3.94 by 4.72 by 0.79 in as its package size, and its own text states a tray of 10 by 1.4 inches with a 9.1 inch size also available. A 10 inch tray does not go into a 4.72 inch box, and four of them certainly do not, so the figure describes something else and the listing does not say what.

It is reported here because it is published and because the brief for this page is to use the makers own numbers. It is not used in the ranking. What LANDNEOO does publish usefully is a complete tray size, 10 by 1.4 inches, which two of the other three multipacks never give at all.

Stacking Flat Against Stacking Upward

The One Unit That Builds a Column

The LAMU two tier organizer is the only listing in this pool that describes stacking as a design feature. Its own words say that buying two sets lets you stack them into a three tier clear organizer, and it states the mechanics that make that plausible: metal rods between the tiers rather than plastic, and assembly and removal with no tools.

It also publishes the figures to check it against a cabinet: 9.25 inches in diameter, 7.7 inches tall in the maker own bullet, a 1 inch raised edge and 0.99 lb. The height field says 7.9 in instead, which the listing never reconciles, so the maker own sentence is what this page uses and the field is reported beside it.

Nesting Is a Different Kind of Stacking

The LAMU three pack arrives as 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inch trays, which is the only set here built from different sizes. Three graduated trays sit inside one another, which is why 2.56 in of carton depth covers all three. In use they go to three different places, so the nesting matters mostly in the box and in a cupboard once two of them are spare.

CiWiVOKi and LANDNEOO take the opposite approach with four identical trays, which stack rather than nest. CiWiVOKi reaches 1.35 in of carton depth that way, against 2.56 in and 3.5 in for the other two packs. The cost is that four identical trays give no choice of size, so a 12 inch shelf and a narrow spice cupboard get the same object.

Edges, Feet and What Happens When It Spins

Two Makers Hold the Items, Two Hold the Tray

The LAMU two tier unit publishes a 1 inch raised edge and the LAMU three pack says it has three different raised edge sizes without measuring any of them. Guzon describes a high edge, also unmeasured, and adds two handles per tray. Those are all solutions that wall items in or give you something to grip.

CiWiVOKi and LANDNEOO solve it the other way. CiWiVOKi states a beaded non skid tray surface and four silicone anti slip base feet. LANDNEOO states a diamond shaped silicone non slip surface with anti slip feet underneath. Neither publishes an edge, so items grip the tray rather than being stopped by a lip.

What Each One Spins On

Only two of the five name a bearing. Guzon states stainless steel ball bearings and the LAMU two tier unit states high quality ball bearings with 360 degree rotation. CiWiVOKi says only that it rotates easily, the LAMU three pack describes a reinforced base that rotates smoothly, and LANDNEOO describes a stable structure without naming a mechanism.

No listing publishes anything measurable about rotation, so this is a record of what each maker claims rather than a comparison of performance. For a stacked set it still matters, because the bearing is the part that has to survive a loaded tray being lifted off and put back repeatedly.

Which One Fits Your Kitchen

Four trays in a 1.35 in carton. CiWiVOKi, four 10 inch trays published at 10 by 10 by 1.35 in and 3.44 lb, with a beaded surface and four silicone feet each. No tray height and no bearing are published.

Three sizes for three different shelves. The LAMU three pack, 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inch trays at 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in and 2.3 lb. Its three raised edges are described and never measured.

Building upward in a tall cabinet. The LAMU two tier unit, 9.25 inches across and 7.7 inches tall in the maker own words, 0.99 lb, with a 1 inch edge. Stacking to three tiers means buying two sets.

Lifting a loaded tray off the stack. Guzon, four 11.5 inch trays with two handles each, published at 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in and 4.45 lb. A 3.5 in carton figure, and no dishwasher.

Grip rather than a lip. LANDNEOO, four 10 inch trays stated at 10 by 1.4 inches with a diamond silicone surface and anti slip feet. Its published pack figure is too small to be the carton.

What We Could Not Verify

These are the figures this comparison went looking for and could not source from the listings themselves.

  • A tray height for CiWiVOKi, Guzon and the LAMU three pack.
  • A per tray weight for any of the four multipacks, and any weight at all for LANDNEOO.
  • What the LANDNEOO pack figure of 3.94 by 4.72 by 0.79 in measures.
  • Measurements for the three raised edges the LAMU three pack describes.
  • Whether the LAMU three pack is acrylic or plastic. Its own bullets say both.
  • Whether four identical trays can be stored stacked in use rather than only in the carton. No listing says.

Frequently asked questions

What does a published pack figure tell you about stacking?+

It tells you how much height a set takes when it is not in use, which is the only stacking figure any of these listings publish. CiWiVOKi gives 10 by 10 by 1.35 in for four 10 inch trays, the LAMU three pack 11.81 by 11.81 by 2.56 in for three graduated trays, and Guzon 11.5 by 11.5 by 3.5 in for four 11.5 inch trays.

Which of these actually stacks into a taller unit?+

Only the LAMU two tier organizer, and it states the condition. Its own text says that buying two sets lets you stack them into a three tier clear organizer. Everything else in this group is a flat tray or a set of flat trays, so stacking means storing them inside each other rather than building upward in a cabinet.

Why is one of the pack figures not used here?+

Because it cannot be right. LANDNEOO publishes 3.94 by 4.72 by 0.79 in as its package figure while its own text states a tray of 10 by 1.4 inches. A 10 inch tray does not fit inside a 4.72 inch box, let alone four of them, so the figure is reported as published and the ranking uses the stated tray size instead.

Do graduated sizes store better than identical ones?+

They can, because three trays of 9.25, 10.6 and 12 inches sit inside each other, and the LAMU three pack publishes 2.56 in of carton depth for all three. Four identical 10 inch CiWiVOKi trays stack rather than nest and publish 1.35 in, which is shallower still. Four identical 11.5 inch Guzon trays publish 3.5 in, because each one carries handles and a high edge.

How much of each tray is usable once the edge is counted?+

Only one listing lets you work it out. The LAMU two tier unit publishes a 1 inch raised edge against a 9.25 inch diameter. The LAMU three pack says it has three different raised edge sizes without measuring any of them, Guzon describes a high edge without a figure, and CiWiVOKi and LANDNEOO describe non slip surfaces instead of edges.

Which of these can be washed in a dishwasher?+

None of the five says so. Guzon states in capitals that it must not go in a dishwasher. CiWiVOKi recommends hand washing and drying naturally without a dryer, and LANDNEOO recommends hand washing and drying completely. The LAMU three pack says to rinse with water or wipe with a damp towel, and the LAMU two tier unit says to clean it with water.

Specifications come from the manufacturers' own published listings. Lush Food & Drink may earn a commission if you buy through a link on this page, at no extra cost to you. How we research.