Lush Food & Drink
Buying Guide

Best Bread Dough Scrapers for Sizes Written in Both Units

The deciding specification is which unit system each figure was taken in before it reached the listing, because three of these five publish a blade width of 4.7, 4.72 or 4.74 inches, which is 12 centimeters in every case, and only one of the three says so.

By the Lush Editorial Team·Researched & Compared

  • Researched & ComparedSpecs pulled from the manufacturer listing
  • Like-for-LikeSame measures across every model
  • No Paid PlacementsNobody pays to appear here

I converted every figure on these five listings back into centimeters and millimeters, then set the result against which unit each maker actually declares, using only each listing's own text.

Our Shortlist

Same Numbers. A Clearer Choice.
Best for a size printed in both unit systems
SURDOCA Dough Scraper Bench Scraper - 3P 4.7x3.7" Pl...

SURDOCA Dough Scraper Bench Scraper - 3P 4.7x3.7" Pl...

The only listing of the five with two unit systems in the size row, which reads 12 by 9.5 centimeters with 4.7 by 3.7 inches beside it, and the first bullet repeats the same pair at the end of its sentence. That makes it the page's reference point: a listing that prints the conversion lets you reverse the two that do not. It also means its declared 12 centimeters at 4.7 inches identifies the 4.72 inch width field on Anmarko and the 4.74 inches in the MS WGO bullet as the same measurement. Its own dimension fields are a third set, 3.54, 4.33 and 0.24 inches, which convert to exactly 9, 11 and 0.6 centimeters, so they are metric too and describe something other than the scraper the row measures. With three scrapers in the purchase the likeliest reading is that the row is one of them and the fields another. Flexible food grade PE plastic rather than rigid PP, a curved edge, a straight edge and sharp corners, an anti slip textured face, and warm water or a dishwasher both cleared. 0.11 lb.

  • 12x9.5cm/4.7x3.7''
  • 0.11 lb
Check Price
Best for figures that were native to inches
Norpro Stainless Steel Scraper/Chopper

Norpro Stainless Steel Scraper/Chopper

Norpro puts its pair in the title, 6 inches with 15 centimeters and 4 inches with 10 centimeters, and its size row then carries the 6 inches alone. Its width field reads 6 inches and its height field reads 4 inches, which are the inch halves of those two pairs, so this is the one listing on the page whose figures were taken in inches and converted outward rather than the reverse. The metric in the title is the rounded half, not the source. Two things on the listing need flagging. Its depth field reads 1 inch, which cannot be the thickness of the stainless blade it describes, and the height field of 4 inches is so far above the typical height figure in this category that an outlier rule marks the correct number as the suspect one. Beyond the size it publishes an integral rounded handle, a straight sided rectangular blade, a measuring guide on the blade for cutting pasta and pastry, and a stainless steel blade. At 0.1 lb it is the lightest purchase here, and no washing route is stated anywhere.

  • 6"
  • 0.1 lb
Check Price
Best for a stated metal thickness on a griddle
Dough Cutter for Bread and Pizza Dough - Stainless S...

Dough Cutter for Bread and Pizza Dough - Stainless S...

The size row holds a blade thickness expressed as a fraction of an inch, which is not a size and is also the only thickness any of these five states in words. The second bullet repeats the same fraction as the thickness of the metal. On a tool that gets pushed across a flat top griddle that is the figure that decides whether it survives, so the row is useful even though it answers the wrong question. Its real figures sit in the fields: 4.72 inches, which SURDOCA's own conversion on this page identifies as 12 centimeters, and 6 inches, which is a round inch. One slot metric, one slot imperial, on a listing whose blade is marked with an inch scale. The height field was discarded as a near zero reading, so the fraction in the row is the only thickness figure that survives. Stainless steel with an ergonomic non-slip wooden handle, described as commercial quality and suitable for chopping vegetables as well as sectioning pie crusts. 0.42 lb, and no washing instruction of any kind.

  • 1/32 Inch
  • 0.42 lb
Check Price
Best for portioning dough into equal pieces
Pro Dough Pastry Scraper/Cutter/Chopper Stainless St...

Pro Dough Pastry Scraper/Cutter/Chopper Stainless St...

The size row holds the words stainless steel, which is a material rather than a measurement, so everything useful is elsewhere. The fourth bullet publishes a triple of 5.75 by 4.74 by 1 inches, and two of those three are round inch fractions while the 4.74 is the same 12 centimeter width SURDOCA names and Anmarko carries in a field. The dimension fields disagree with the bullet entirely. They read 7.09, 6.69 and 1.18 inches, which convert to exactly 18, 17 and 3 centimeters, three whole metric numbers all larger than the bullet figures, which is what a package normally looks like rather than a tool. Use the bullet and set the fields aside. The listing publishes a measuring scale for making equal portions, mirror polished heavy duty stainless steel, a no rust claim, a dishwasher clearance and a separate instruction to rinse with water and wipe with a cloth after use. 0.34 lb.

  • Stainless steel
  • 0.34 lb
Check Price
Best for scraping a bowl without scratching it
Silicone Dough Scraper with Metal Core Flexible Bowl...

Silicone Dough Scraper with Metal Core Flexible Bowl...

Silicone over a stainless steel sheet core, which is the only construction of the five that flexes against a bowl wall and still holds an edge for cutting. Its size row reads 5.98 by 4.3 inches and the third bullet repeats the same pair, and the depth field carries the 5.98 while the width field carries the 4.3, so the row and the fields agree. Convert them and you get 152 millimeters and 109 millimeters, whole millimeters rather than whole centimeters or round inches, which puts the drawing behind this tool on a millimeter grid and makes the two decimal places arithmetic rather than precision. The listing describes a curved edge for bowl walls of different sizes and a flat edge for cutting dough, two pieces per purchase, heat resistance with no figure attached, a dishwasher clearance and a small hanging hole for storage. Its height field was discarded as a near zero reading. 0.44 lb, which is the heaviest purchase on the page.

  • 5.98"×4.3"
  • 0.44 lb
Check Price

Side by Side Comparison

ModelBrandSize (Capacity)WeightBest For
SURDOCA Dough Scraper Bench Scraper - 3P 4.7x3.7" Pl... SURDOCA 12x9.5cm/4.7x3.7'' 0.11 lb Best for a size printed in both unit systems
Norpro Stainless Steel Scraper/Chopper Norpro 6" 0.1 lb Best for figures that were native to inches
Dough Cutter for Bread and Pizza Dough - Stainless S... Anmarko 1/32 Inch 0.42 lb Best for a stated metal thickness on a griddle
Pro Dough Pastry Scraper/Cutter/Chopper Stainless St... MS WGO Stainless steel 0.34 lb Best for portioning dough into equal pieces
Silicone Dough Scraper with Metal Core Flexible Bowl... SAPID 5.98"×4.3" 0.44 lb Best for scraping a bowl without scratching it

Each Pick in Detail

1 Best for a size printed in both unit systems
SURDOCA Dough Scraper Bench Scraper - 3P 4.7x3.7" Pl...

SURDOCA Dough Scraper Bench Scraper - 3P 4.7x3.7" Pl...

The only listing of the five with two unit systems in the size row, which reads 12 by 9.5 centimeters with 4.7 by 3.7 inches beside it, and the first bullet repeats the same pair at the end of its sentence. That makes it the page's reference point: a listing that prints the conversion lets you reverse the two that do not. It also means its declared 12 centimeters at 4.7 inches identifies the 4.72 inch width field on Anmarko and the 4.74 inches in the MS WGO bullet as the same measurement. Its own dimension fields are a third set, 3.54, 4.33 and 0.24 inches, which convert to exactly 9, 11 and 0.6 centimeters, so they are metric too and describe something other than the scraper the row measures. With three scrapers in the purchase the likeliest reading is that the row is one of them and the fields another. Flexible food grade PE plastic rather than rigid PP, a curved edge, a straight edge and sharp corners, an anti slip textured face, and warm water or a dishwasher both cleared. 0.11 lb.

  • Both unit systems are printed in the size row, 12 by 9.5 centimeters with 4.7 by 3.7 inches
  • The same pair is repeated at the end of the first bullet
  • Three scrapers in one purchase, with a curved edge, a straight edge and sharp corners
  • The dimension fields are a third set of figures, 9 by 11 by 0.6 centimeters
  • Nothing says which of the three scrapers the row describes and which the fields describe
Check Price
2 Best for figures that were native to inches
Norpro Stainless Steel Scraper/Chopper

Norpro Stainless Steel Scraper/Chopper

Norpro puts its pair in the title, 6 inches with 15 centimeters and 4 inches with 10 centimeters, and its size row then carries the 6 inches alone. Its width field reads 6 inches and its height field reads 4 inches, which are the inch halves of those two pairs, so this is the one listing on the page whose figures were taken in inches and converted outward rather than the reverse. The metric in the title is the rounded half, not the source. Two things on the listing need flagging. Its depth field reads 1 inch, which cannot be the thickness of the stainless blade it describes, and the height field of 4 inches is so far above the typical height figure in this category that an outlier rule marks the correct number as the suspect one. Beyond the size it publishes an integral rounded handle, a straight sided rectangular blade, a measuring guide on the blade for cutting pasta and pastry, and a stainless steel blade. At 0.1 lb it is the lightest purchase here, and no washing route is stated anywhere.

  • Both unit systems are printed in the title, 6 inches with 15 centimeters and 4 inches with 10 centimeters
  • The width and height fields of 6 inches and 4 inches match the title's inch figures
  • A measuring guide on the blade is published
  • The depth field reads 1 inch, which cannot be the blade thickness
  • No washing route is stated anywhere on the listing
Check Price
3 Best for a stated metal thickness on a griddle
Dough Cutter for Bread and Pizza Dough - Stainless S...

Dough Cutter for Bread and Pizza Dough - Stainless S...

The size row holds a blade thickness expressed as a fraction of an inch, which is not a size and is also the only thickness any of these five states in words. The second bullet repeats the same fraction as the thickness of the metal. On a tool that gets pushed across a flat top griddle that is the figure that decides whether it survives, so the row is useful even though it answers the wrong question. Its real figures sit in the fields: 4.72 inches, which SURDOCA's own conversion on this page identifies as 12 centimeters, and 6 inches, which is a round inch. One slot metric, one slot imperial, on a listing whose blade is marked with an inch scale. The height field was discarded as a near zero reading, so the fraction in the row is the only thickness figure that survives. Stainless steel with an ergonomic non-slip wooden handle, described as commercial quality and suitable for chopping vegetables as well as sectioning pie crusts. 0.42 lb, and no washing instruction of any kind.

  • A blade thickness is published as a fraction of an inch, in the row and in a bullet
  • An inch scale is marked on the blade for measuring while cooking
  • An ergonomic non-slip wooden handle on a stainless steel blade
  • The size row carries a thickness rather than a size
  • The height field was discarded as a near zero reading
Check Price
4 Best for portioning dough into equal pieces
Pro Dough Pastry Scraper/Cutter/Chopper Stainless St...

Pro Dough Pastry Scraper/Cutter/Chopper Stainless St...

The size row holds the words stainless steel, which is a material rather than a measurement, so everything useful is elsewhere. The fourth bullet publishes a triple of 5.75 by 4.74 by 1 inches, and two of those three are round inch fractions while the 4.74 is the same 12 centimeter width SURDOCA names and Anmarko carries in a field. The dimension fields disagree with the bullet entirely. They read 7.09, 6.69 and 1.18 inches, which convert to exactly 18, 17 and 3 centimeters, three whole metric numbers all larger than the bullet figures, which is what a package normally looks like rather than a tool. Use the bullet and set the fields aside. The listing publishes a measuring scale for making equal portions, mirror polished heavy duty stainless steel, a no rust claim, a dishwasher clearance and a separate instruction to rinse with water and wipe with a cloth after use. 0.34 lb.

  • A full triple is published in a bullet, 5.75 by 4.74 by 1 inches
  • A measuring scale for equal portions is published
  • A dishwasher clearance and a separate rinse and wipe instruction
  • The size row holds a material rather than a measurement
  • The dimension fields of 7.09, 6.69 and 1.18 inches disagree with the bullet
Check Price
5 Best for scraping a bowl without scratching it
Silicone Dough Scraper with Metal Core Flexible Bowl...

Silicone Dough Scraper with Metal Core Flexible Bowl...

Silicone over a stainless steel sheet core, which is the only construction of the five that flexes against a bowl wall and still holds an edge for cutting. Its size row reads 5.98 by 4.3 inches and the third bullet repeats the same pair, and the depth field carries the 5.98 while the width field carries the 4.3, so the row and the fields agree. Convert them and you get 152 millimeters and 109 millimeters, whole millimeters rather than whole centimeters or round inches, which puts the drawing behind this tool on a millimeter grid and makes the two decimal places arithmetic rather than precision. The listing describes a curved edge for bowl walls of different sizes and a flat edge for cutting dough, two pieces per purchase, heat resistance with no figure attached, a dishwasher clearance and a small hanging hole for storage. Its height field was discarded as a near zero reading. 0.44 lb, which is the heaviest purchase on the page.

  • The size row and the dimension fields agree, 5.98 by 4.3 inches
  • The same pair is repeated in the third bullet
  • Silicone over a stainless steel sheet core, with a curved edge and a flat edge
  • The height field was discarded as a near zero reading
  • The figures are converted from whole millimeters, so the decimals are arithmetic
Check Price

Our Verdict

SURDOCA is the only one of the five that publishes both unit systems in its size row, 12 by 9.5 centimeters with 4.7 by 3.7 inches. Norpro publishes both in its title, 6 inches with 15 centimeters and 4 inches with 10 centimeters. Anmarko's width field reads 4.72 inches and MS WGO's own bullet reads 4.74 inches, which are the same 12 centimeters SURDOCA names. SAPID publishes 5.98 by 4.3 inches, which are 152 millimeters and 109 millimeters.

“Three sellers, one metric width, three different inch readings.”

Lush Food & Drink
Good Food
Brighter Days

What Separates These Five

Both units, in the size row SURDOCA writes 12 by 9.5 centimeters with 4.7 by 3.7 inches. It is the only listing here that shows its own conversion.
Both units, in the title Norpro gives 6 inches with 15 centimeters and 4 inches with 10 centimeters. Its fields carry the inch halves.
One width, three spellings SURDOCA calls 12 centimeters 4.7 inches. Anmarko's field says 4.72 inches. MS WGO's bullet says 4.74 inches.
A thickness where a size should be Anmarko's size row holds a blade thickness as a fraction of an inch. Its only size figures are in the dimension fields.
Whole centimeters in an inch slot MS WGO's three fields read 7.09, 6.69 and 1.18 inches, which are exactly 18, 17 and 3 centimeters.

How We Chose

Both unit systems printed
Figures in the size row
A size in the maker's own words
Fields that land on whole metric numbers
A measuring scale on the blade
A washing route published

Frequently Asked Questions

How can you tell an inch figure was converted from metric?+

Convert it back and see where it lands. MS WGO publishes 7.09, 6.69 and 1.18 inches, which are exactly 18, 17 and 3 centimeters. SURDOCA's fields of 3.54, 4.33 and 0.24 inches are exactly 9, 11 and 0.6 centimeters. Figures measured on an inch rule do not all land on whole metric numbers. Norpro's 6 inches and 4 inches are round in inches instead, which is the opposite signal.

Why does it matter which unit a figure started in?+

Because it tells you how much precision the decimals really carry. SAPID's 5.98 inches looks like a measurement taken to two places, and it is 152 millimeters rounded, so the last digit is arithmetic. Comparing SAPID's 5.98 inches with another listing's 6 inches as though the difference were real would be comparing two rounding choices applied to figures that may well be the same.

Which of these listings prints both unit systems?+

Two. SURDOCA puts 12 by 9.5 centimeters with 4.7 by 3.7 inches in its size row and repeats the pair in its first bullet. Norpro puts 6 inches with 15 centimeters and 4 inches with 10 centimeters in its title. Those two are what make the other three readable, because a declared pair identifies the unit behind a figure that a lone inch reading cannot.

Is the same blade width really on three of these?+

The figures say so. SURDOCA states that 12 centimeters is 4.7 inches. Anmarko's width field reads 4.72 inches, which is 12 centimeters. MS WGO's bullet reads 4.74 inches, also 12 centimeters. Three unrelated sellers, one metric figure and three different roundings. That does not prove the three tools are identical, but it does mean their widths are not usefully different.

Why would a size row hold a thickness or a material?+

Because that slot is free text and a seller can put whatever distinguishes one variation from another. Anmarko sells one thickness and puts the fraction there. MS WGO sells one material and puts stainless steel there. Neither is a size, so both listings leave the dimension fields and the bullets to carry the measurement, and on MS WGO those two disagree with each other.

Which of these is the lightest and which the heaviest?+

Norpro publishes 0.1 lb and SURDOCA publishes 0.11 lb, the two lightest figures here, which fits a thin stainless blade and a set of plastic sheets. SAPID publishes 0.44 lb, the heaviest, which fits a silicone body wrapped around a steel core. Anmarko publishes 0.42 lb and MS WGO publishes 0.34 lb. All five publish a weight, which is unusual for a category this small.

Specifications come from the manufacturers' own published listings. Lush Food & Drink may earn a commission if you buy through a link on this page, at no extra cost to you. How we research.

How the Five Compare on the Numbers

Two of these five tell you which unit system they measured in, because they print both. The other three print inches only, and converting those inches back shows that two of the three were never measured in inches at all. The clearest evidence is a single blade width that appears on three of the five listings, written three slightly different ways, and identical in metric.

All five publish a weight and all five fill at least two dimension fields. Three state a washing route and three describe a measuring scale printed on the blade. What nobody publishes is a plain statement of which figure is the blade and which is the handle, so the unit question has to be answered by arithmetic rather than by reading.

Specification SURDOCA Norpro Anmarko MS WGO SAPID
What the size row holds Two figures in both units One figure in inches A blade thickness The words stainless steel Two figures in inches
Both unit systems printed Yes, in the size row Yes, in the title No No No
Width field 3.54 inches 6 inches 4.72 inches 7.09 inches 4.3 inches
Depth field 4.33 inches 1 inch 6 inches 6.69 inches 5.98 inches
Height field 0.24 inches 4 inches not published 1.18 inches not published
Size in the maker’s own words 12 by 9.5 centimeters, with 4.7 by 3.7 inches 6 inches and 4 inches not published 5.75 by 4.74 by 1 inches 5.98 by 4.3 inches
Do the fields land on whole centimeters Yes, all three No, they are round inches One of the two Yes, all three No, they are whole millimeters
Weight field 0.11 lb 0.1 lb 0.42 lb 0.34 lb 0.44 lb
Material named Food grade PE plastic Stainless steel blade Stainless steel, wooden handle Heavy duty stainless steel Silicone over a steel core
A measuring scale on the blade not published Yes, a measuring guide Yes, marked in inches Yes, a measuring scale not published
Washing route published Warm water or dishwasher not published not published Dishwasher safe, or rinse and wipe Dishwasher safe
Pieces in one purchase Three One One One Two

What the table cannot show is that these inch figures are mostly arithmetic. Three of the five publish a width that converts to exactly 12 centimeters, three publish a length that converts to 15.2 centimeters or 15 centimeters, and only two listings say a word about metric. Nothing in the table marks which figures were read off a tool and which were calculated from a drawing.

The Two Listings That Say Which Unit

Both Systems in the Size Row

SURDOCA is the only one of the five to put two unit systems in the size row itself. It reads 12 by 9.5 centimeters with 4.7 by 3.7 inches beside it, and the first bullet repeats the same pair at the end of its sentence. That makes this the only listing on the page where a reader can see the conversion being done rather than having to reverse it.

Its dimension fields are then a third set: 3.54, 4.33 and 0.24 inches. Convert those and they are exactly 9, 11 and 0.6 centimeters, whole numbers again, so the fields are metric too and describe a different object from the one the row measures. With three scrapers in the purchase, the most likely explanation is that the row is one scraper and the fields are another.

Both Systems in the Title

Norpro writes its pair into the title instead, giving 6 inches with 15 centimeters and 4 inches with 10 centimeters, and its size row then carries only the 6 inches. Its width field reads 6 inches and its height field reads 4 inches, so the fields are the inch halves of the pairs and the metric halves are the rounded ones.

That makes Norpro the one listing here whose figures are native to inches: a 6 by 4 inch blade stated in round inches and converted outward, rather than a metric figure converted in. Its depth field reads 1 inch, which is not a credible thickness for a stainless blade, and the pool’s median height field is so small that its real 4 inch figure gets flagged as the odd one out.

One Blade Width, Three Spellings

Twelve Centimeters, Written Three Ways

SURDOCA states that 12 centimeters is 4.7 inches. Anmarko’s width field reads 4.72 inches. MS WGO’s own bullet gives 4.74 inches. Those three figures are the same measurement, and SURDOCA’s declared pair is what proves it, because a listing that prints both systems removes the guesswork from the two that print one.

Three unrelated sellers publishing one metric figure as three different inch readings is a strong signal about where these numbers come from. None of the three measured a tool to two decimal places in inches. One rounded to one decimal, one rounded the division, and one rounded differently, and all three were working from a 12 centimeter drawing. The width is the same on all three scrapers.

The Length Does the Same Thing

SAPID publishes 5.98 by 4.3 inches in its size row and again in a bullet, and its depth field holds the 5.98. Convert it and you get 152 millimeters, with 109 millimeters for the other figure. Those are whole millimeters, not whole centimeters and certainly not round inches, which puts SAPID’s drawing on a millimeter grid.

Norpro’s 15 centimeters and Anmarko’s 6 inch depth field both sit in the same neighborhood, and neither is the same number. So the category has a blade length somewhere near six inches that different sellers have written as 15 centimeters, as 6 inches and as 152 millimeters. A buyer comparing two decimal places across these listings is comparing rounding decisions.

The Two Rows That Carry No Size at All

A Thickness in the Size Slot

Anmarko puts a blade thickness in its size row, expressed as a fraction of an inch, and repeats the same fraction in its second bullet as the thickness of the metal. That is a real and useful specification, and it is the only thickness figure stated in words on this page. It is also not a size, so the row answers a question nobody asked of it.

Its actual figures are in the fields: 4.72 inches, which SURDOCA’s own conversion identifies as 12 centimeters, and 6 inches, which is a round inch. One slot metric, one slot imperial, on a listing that publishes a scale marked in inches. The height field was discarded as a near zero figure, so the fraction in the row is the only thickness this listing really has.

A Material in the Size Slot

MS WGO puts the words stainless steel in its size row, which is a material rather than a measurement. Its fourth bullet does publish a triple, 5.75 by 4.74 by 1 inches, and those are inch figures with one exception: the 4.74 is 12 centimeters, the same width SURDOCA names and Anmarko carries in a field.

Its dimension fields disagree with all of that. They read 7.09, 6.69 and 1.18 inches, which convert to exactly 18, 17 and 3 centimeters. Three whole centimeters, all three larger than the figures in the bullet, which is what a package usually looks like. The bullet is the tool and the fields are something the tool came in.

Which One Fits Your Kitchen

The buyer who wants the conversion done for them. SURDOCA is the pick. Its size row gives 12 by 9.5 centimeters and 4.7 by 3.7 inches together, so neither unit has to be worked out. Three flexible food grade PE plastic scrapers arrive, with a curved edge, a straight edge and sharp corners, and warm water or a dishwasher are both cleared.

The buyer who trusts round inches. Norpro is the only listing here whose figures were native to inches, 6 inches by 4 inches, with the metric in its title as the derived half. It has an integral rounded handle, a straight sided rectangular blade and a measuring guide on the blade, and at 0.1 lb it is the lightest of the five.

The buyer scraping a griddle as well as a bench. Anmarko publishes a blade thickness in a fraction of an inch and is the only one of the five to do so in words, which is the figure that matters on a tool pushed across cast iron. Its field figures are 4.72 inches and 6 inches, it has a non-slip wooden handle, and the blade is marked in inches.

The buyer dividing dough into equal pieces. MS WGO publishes 5.75 by 4.74 by 1 inches in a bullet, a measuring scale for portioning, mirror polished heavy duty stainless, and both a dishwasher clearance and a rinse and wipe instruction. Use the bullet figures and set aside its dimension fields, which are 18, 17 and 3 centimeters and describe something larger.

The buyer who does not want metal in the bowl. SAPID is silicone over a stainless steel core, so it flexes to a bowl wall without scratching it, and the same tool has a flat edge for cutting. It publishes 5.98 by 4.3 inches, which are 152 millimeters and 109 millimeters, two pieces per purchase, a dishwasher clearance and a hanging hole.

What We Could Not Verify

Six questions went looking for a figure on these listings and came back without one.

  • Which of the three SURDOCA scrapers the size row describes and which the dimension fields describe, where the row gives 12 by 9.5 centimeters and the fields give 9 by 11.
  • Why the Norpro depth field reads 1 inch, which cannot be the thickness of the stainless blade the listing describes.
  • What the Anmarko blade measures from end to end, where its fields give 4.72 inches and 6 inches and nothing says which is the blade.
  • What the MS WGO fields of 7.09, 6.69 and 1.18 inches measure, since its own bullet publishes 5.75 by 4.74 by 1 inches instead.
  • A thickness for SURDOCA, Norpro, MS WGO or SAPID, where only one listing of the five states one in words.
  • A washing route for Norpro or Anmarko, where neither mentions a dishwasher, a hand wash or a temperature.