Lush Food & Drink

Explainer

Juicer vs Blender: Which Is Better for Fruits and Vegetables?

A juicer removes the fiber for a thin concentrated drink; a blender keeps it for a thick filling one. Greens favor the juicer, meals and cleanup favor the blender.

By the Lush Editorial Team·Researched & Compared

One removes the fiber, the other keeps it

A juicer separates liquid from pulp and throws the fiber away, so you drink a concentrated, thin, fast absorbed liquid. A blender keeps everything in the glass, so you drink a thick, filling puree with all the fiber intact. Neither is better in the abstract: juicing wins on volume of produce per glass and on greens, blending wins on satiety, waste and cleanup.

If you want vegetables you would never eat in quantity, a juicer gets them into you. If you want a drink that replaces a meal, a blender does that and a juicer cannot.

What happens to the produce in each machine

A juicer either shreds produce at speed and spins the juice out through a mesh basket, or grinds and presses it against a screen with a slow auger. The machines in our juicer guide publish both approaches, with slow models citing 55 RPM and 60 RPM and a high speed model publishing 800W with a 3 inch wide mouth. Either way the fiber leaves as pulp, and ours publish pulp containers of 36oz and hoppers up to 100oz, which is a fair picture of how much material comes out the other side.

A blender does not separate anything. Blades in a sealed jar cut and recirculate the whole fruit or vegetable into a suspension, so skins, fiber and seeds all stay in the drink. The jars in our blender guide publish capacities of 40 ounces, 48 oz, 68oz, 70 Oz and 72oz with motors of 700 watts, 1800W and 2700W, and the motor is there to break down what a juicer would have discarded.

Fiber, absorption and the honest limits of the claim

Removing fiber makes the sugars and nutrients in a glass reach you faster, which is the appeal of a green juice before breakfast and the reason a fruit-heavy juice hits like a soft drink. Keeping fiber slows all of that down and fills you up, which is why a smoothie is a breakfast and a juice is not.

What this site cannot tell you is how much of any particular nutrient survives either process. None of the makers in these guides publishes a nutrient figure, and the ones that mention nutrition do it in marketing language: two juicers publish 99 percent juice yield claims and several describe minimizing oxidation at low speed. Yield is measurable and it is not the same as nutrition. Treat any number about vitamins on a juicer box as a claim rather than a measurement.

Which produce belongs in which machine

Juicer: leafy greens, celery, cucumber, carrot, beet, ginger, apple, citrus and anything fibrous you want the liquid from rather than the substance of. Kale and wheatgrass in particular are a juicer job, because they are fiber with little water behind them and a blender leaves you with a gritty green paste.

Blender: bananas, avocado, mango, berries, yogurt, nut butters, oats, dates and anything soft or creamy. Avocado and banana have almost no free juice to extract, so a juicer either blocks or produces a spoonful. Frozen fruit belongs in a blender too, and the stronger machines are built for it.

Both: apples, pineapple, oranges, carrots and cucumber all work in either, with different results. A cucumber juice is water thin and refreshing; a cucumber smoothie is a thick green drink.

Waste, cost and the practical arithmetic

A juicer needs considerably more produce per glass, because most of the volume leaves as pulp. That is the quiet cost of juicing, and the pulp bin sizes published in our guide are the evidence. Some of it is usable in muffins, stock and fritters, and most of it gets composted.

A blender wastes nothing, which makes it cheaper to run per drink and better if produce prices are the deciding factor. It is also the more flexible machine: the same jar makes soup, pesto, batter, dips and dressings, while a juicer does one thing.

Cleaning, which decides how often each gets used

A blender jar is one part plus a lid, and a blitz with soapy water gets most of it clean. A juicer has a chute, a screen or filter basket, a pulp spout, a juice bowl and either an auger or a cutting disc, and the mesh has to be brushed before the pulp dries. That gap is the single biggest reason juicers end up in cupboards and blenders stay on counters.

The makers know it. One cold press juicer in our cold press guide publishes a five minute cleanup with a one piece interior and an included brush, and several publish detachable parts or a separable feed tube. It is still more work than rinsing a jar.

How to choose

Buy a blender if you want one appliance, if you want drinks that fill you up, if you cook as well as drink, or if you are not going to enjoy cleaning a mesh screen every morning. Buy a juicer if greens are the point, if you want large quantities of vegetables in liquid form, or if you already own a blender and you specifically want what a blender cannot do.

And if you buy a juicer, choose by mechanism rather than by wattage. The slow machines in our guides publish 350W and 400W with speeds of 55 RPM to 64 RPM and handle greens well; the high speed machines publish up to 800W and get through hard produce faster with more froth. The centrifugal guide and the cold press guide separate those two families, and the choice between them matters more than any single number on the box.

Common questions

Can I use a blender and then strain it to make juice?

Yes, and it works better than people expect. Blend with a little water, then pour through a fine mesh strainer or a nut milk bag and squeeze. You get juice without owning a juicer, at the cost of a messy extra step and slightly more oxidation from the blending. For occasional juice this is the honest answer to whether you need a second machine.

Which is better for weight management?

Blending, for one straightforward reason: fiber. A smoothie with the fiber intact empties from the stomach slowly and feels like food, while a fruit juice delivers the sugars quickly and does not. Vegetable-led juices are a different case, since there is little sugar in celery or cucumber, but a fruit juice is closer to a soft drink than to the fruit it came from.

Do juicers destroy nutrients?

The fiber is removed deliberately, and beyond that the honest answer is that this site cannot quantify it. Makers publish claims about minimizing heat and oxidation at 55 to 64 RPM, and those are claims rather than measurements. What is certain is that juice oxidizes in the glass over hours, so drinking it soon after making it matters more than which machine made it.

Is a high speed blender enough for green juice?

It will get greens drinkable and it will not make juice. Leafy fiber does not dissolve, so even a 2700W machine leaves a thick green liquid with texture, which some people enjoy and others cannot drink. Straining afterward through a fine mesh bag closes the gap, which is the usual workaround for anyone who wants green juice without buying a juicer.

Which machine handles a big batch better?

A juicer, if the hopper is large: ours publish hoppers and pulp bins up to 100oz, which is several drinks in one session. Blender jars publish 40 ounces to 72oz, and a blender makes its full jar in under a minute, so it is faster per batch and smaller per batch. For a family breakfast, two blender jars beat one long juicing session on time.